>>191174, >>191175, >>191176, >>191177, >>191178, >>191179, >>191180, >>191181, >>191182, >>191183, >>191184, >>191185, >>191186, >>191187, >>191188, >>191189, >>191190, >>191191, >>191192, >>191193, >>191194, >>191195, >>191196, >>191197, >>191198, >>191199, >>191200, >>191201, >>191202, >>191203, >>191204, >>191205, >>191206, >>191207, >>191208, >>191209, >>191210, >>191211, >>191212, >>191213
James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII - Project Veritas did not pay for this appeal and are not even a named party in the Court of Appeals. They refused to indemnify their reporters after my termination, so I had to raise the money privately to indemnify Allison Maas, who is a named party.
Parent Post:
Project Veritas @Project_Veritas - First Amendment WIN: D.C. Circuit reversed the verdict against Project Veritas - ruling undercover reporting is protected speech, not fraud. A WIN for every undercover journalist exposing the truth. @Chris_Hartsock https://youtube.com/watch?v=q4Q2_RSMc4U [Embed]
https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/2091190485708636498

James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII - Yes
Parent Post:
Kevin Halpern @SpearingSharks - Is the D.C. Circuit Appeal ruling new case law for the new lawsuits by your stalker, the Lawyer Mark Zaid for the dating app stings?
https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/2091058820172636316

James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII - From the ORDER…
https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/2091005568827703385

James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII - Video: Democracy Partners vs. O’Keefe - VERDICT OVERTURNED
VICTORY IN D.C. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, PANEL RULES 2-1
Appeal Court Rules Undercover Journalism Protected as 1st Amendment Activity setting precedent for all undercover journalism.