>>191671, >>191672, >>191673, >>191674, >>191675, >>191676, >>191677, >>191678, >>191679, >>191680, >>191681, >>191682, >>191683, >>191684, >>191685, >>191686, >>191687, >>191688, >>191689, >>191690, >>191691, >>191692, >>191693, >>191694, >>191695, >>191696, >>191697, >>191698, >>191699, >>191700, >>191701, >>191702, >>191703, >>191704, >>191705, >>191706, >>191707, >>191708, >>191709, >>191710 Phil Stewart @phildstewart - Scoop! - Reuters has seen the terms of reference for the Pentagon's troop review in NATO, which aims to decide how many forces will remain in Europe and where. Here are some key takeaways: 1) Moving fast: Hegseth will get at least four sets of options by Nov. 6. Options will include things like variations in the number of forces, locations of forces, speed of adjustments and the cost of adjustments. 2) By Sept. 18, Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby will get a key decision briefing from EUCOM's Gen. Grynkewich where they'll go over options for development. 3) The terms of reference says the review seeks to guarantee reliable U.S. access, basing and overflight rights, called ABO, in allied NATO nations. But they also they examine space, cyber and "intelligence architectures and infrastructure that enable U.S. global power projection," the document says. 4) The document says the Pentagon will seek to determine whether allies have a credible path to meet their NATO spending pledges and fill in gaps to NATO crisis forces — known as the NATO Force Model — after U.S. reductions were announced earlier this year. And there's more.... https://x.com/phildstewart/status/2092991455065158112