>>192210, >>192211, >>192212, >>192213, >>192214, >>192215
Cam Higby @camhigby - Really Tim? I answered definitively, no benefit. I don’t even hold stock or have any indirect non-traditional way of benefiting.
Parent Post:
Tim Pool @Timcast - I did not say paid, I said benefit direct or indirect
I don't believe for a second a grade school reframing technique was organic.
Everyone told you this is about mass surveillance and data collection but youre trying to reframe it to filming
in public
Is your boss taking the money? Who asked you to make this fake argument?
Quoted Post:
Cam Higby @camhigby - I have already answered this question Tim, No. It is possible for people to hold positions and not be paid for them.
In response to the community note that has apparently been added here - the 1st amendment is not what allows me to film people on public without consent. It guarantees that the government won’t stop me from running stories.
The SCOTUS has established that there is no reasonable expectation to privacy in public and that what you expose to the public, is not subject to 4th amendment protections. I cannot be sued or jailed for filming a person in a public space without consent for that reason.
The 1st amendment does not establish this. It establishes nothing about guardrails for journalism. We however also know that if I filmed a person in their home without their knowledge or consent, I’d be toast. Totally open to jail and lawsuits - and justifiably so. The same goes for the government assuming they don’t have proper warrants.
https://x.com/camhigby/status/2095172637093765153

Cam Higby @camhigby - God calls for me to help people, when I have the means I give to who I can regardless of who they are. There was no evidence the bike was stolen, and it wasn’t a nice bike.
Parent Post: