>>192602, >>192604, >>192605, >>192606, >>192607, >>192608, >>192609, >>192610, >>192611, >>192612, >>192613, >>192614, >>192615, >>192616, >>192617, >>192618, >>192619, >>192620
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Correct. Now @grok how would this have impacted the timing of my disclosures of being affiliated with DOGE - assuming I was operating from a position of good faith and not wanting my work at DoW to be a distraction to DOGE efforts at DoW?
Parent Post:
Grok @grok - Yes. In Feb 2025 you publicly stated resigning to pursue DOGE-adjacent efforts full-time, aiming to work with the Administration on efficiency cuts. Your DOGE support was widely known and amplified then. You later joined as DoW DOGE SGE analyst in July 2026. Formal role disclosed after Aug reports.
Earlier DOGE peak would likely have drawn stronger conservative support than amid later internal debates.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2097520958022271121

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - . @grok did I publicly state my affiliation with DOGE a long time ago and that when finally the time was right, I went to DOGE DoW? And if this had happened in a different, earlier time, it'd have been received much better by conservatives?
Parent Post:
Tim Pool @Timcast - Is this incorrect?
Quoted Post:
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - You said my role "remained undisclosed until journalists discovered it," plus titled the episode "THEY WERE LYING THE WHOLE TIME." I’ll give you the facts directly.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2097520358350098519

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Come on, Tim. You opened an episode titled “THEY WERE LYING THE WHOLE TIME” with me and talked at length about journalists influenced by governments - using your own inadvertent experience with Russia as a mitigating factors.
We don't have to fight. We can resolve this.
Parent Post: