>>192828, >>192829, >>192830, >>192831, >>192832, >>192833, >>192834, >>192835, >>192834, >>192837, >>192838, >>192839, >>192840, >>192841, >>192842, >>192843, >>192844, >>192845, >>192846, >>192847, >>192848, >>192849, >>192850, >>192851, >>192852, >>192853, >>192854, >>192855, >>192856, >>192857
A Midwestern Doctor @MidwesternDoc - The pattern repeats because the incentives never change.
A cheap, off-patent treatment that works threatens the franchise. A disease managed for life by a patented product is revenue, and cures are bad for business.
When a doctor uses a competing therapy anyway, the response is a warning to everyone else: Meryl Nass was prosecuted by her medical board for treating COVID with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
Quote:
Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10
Hero Dr. Meryl Nass just WON in court after Maine’s Medical Board suspended her and ordered a ‘Psychiatric Evaluation’ for daring to prescribe ivermectin and defy the Covid Scam orthodoxy…
THANK YOU for your bravery and for taking on the Medical Cartel
https://x.com/MidwesternDoc/status/2098093818650255801

Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee - Article I, Section 4 matters
Quoted Post:
Dan Hauser @hauserdan
He’s wrong. She’s wrong.
The National Voting Rights Act has reporting requirements.
Utah is in violation of those requirements.
If they didn’t agree with NVRA, why have they never sued to undo it?