>>2905
>they turn the inventor into "satan" and make others destroy everything you loved with the tech you created. I am not saying this will happen it's just... caution and foresight is important. I cannot convey it better.
Don't worry, I'm not sharing this outside a small circle, and it's encrypted. Another thing that seemed put there in full view: I turned my understanding of a safe use into a grimoire, it's black. Makes me think about that cult with black books in Re: Zero.
>The "document" probably explains it more accurately what I want to say.
It's simply "science" in its true form, no morality or "betterment of society" included. It does not make any distinction between things that very effectively build houses or very effectively destroys them. Same idea applied to any area.

I think this information can only be shared in this form, stripped of ownership. The person receiving it will have to decide to use it for something beneficial or to create hell for himself and others. Or hell for others and benefit for himself. If it included another person's ideas of right or wrong, it wouldn't be true science.

It seems once received, the document must be grasped in its entirety. Failing to do so because of some moral objections would destroy the person, the part not internalized would corrode their mind until they break, turn insane or start doing something really evil. The information is just so horrifying, but still true.

I read about how someone saw the documents which outlined the illuminati depopulation plans for WW1, and the person turned insane. Something like that. It explains "the lot of it" and this realization will step on your most precious values in the worst way possible, if you have such values in relation to human society.