>>7519
This part about not creating your own law is mentioned in the FD books and lectures and I was very careful around this issue because I felt some immense dark matter when thinking about it. Other practitioners failed to even grasp it when I tried talking about this topic. It was the reason for the "not interpreting the law" demand, where you are not to take any FD text and say "this text means..." but you must say "it is my personal understanding that..."

I noticed that Sigmund Freud actually uses similar phrasings in his books, which is one reason I started taking him more seriously. It is common practice for modern people to talk as if they "know" for a fact what is meant by some ancient text - he doesn't do this.