>>8507
>So would it be different if they could do it for 10 years instead? 100 years? 1,000?
It wouldn't. They already tried that with the "1000 year kingdom of christ", which is called such because it took 1000 years to bring it down.

As for the rest, read my later posts. I have nothing to say to that, because there are too many assumptions which are nullified by things I have seen first hand, addressing each and one of them would require writing an essay of several pages to retell events which in many cases are too private to be shared on here.