Hitler was well aware of this cryptic Darwinism:

One of the most ingenious ruses ever devised was to sail the ship of the Jewish state under the flag of religion, and thus secure the tolerance that Aryans are always ready to grant to different religious beliefs. But the Mosaic Law is nothing other than the doctrine of the preservation of the Jewish race [and its progress towards world domination].[13]

Furthermore, this is not about a social class struggle either as Karl Marx would have it and more recently, Warren Buffet.[14] The richest people on earth are indeed at the helm of this war on humanity, but most of them, with a few exceptions such as Warren Buffet and the Rockefellers, are Jewish.[15] According to revolutionary socialist, Mikhail Bakunin (1814-1876),

Marx completely ignores a most important element in the history of humanity, that is, the temperament and particular character of each “race” and each people, a temperament and character which are themselves the natural product of a multitude of [genetic], ethnological, climatological, economic, and historic causes, but which exercise, even apart from and independent of the economic condition, a considerable influence on its doctrines and even on the development of its economic forces.[16]

Forget the Benjamins. Money is a means to an end just like “liberalism,” “human rights,” and “democracy.” It’s all about race, and nothing but race. The greatest proponent of Zionism, much more important than Theodore Herzl, was Max Nordau, who was also one of the founding fathers of nineteenth-century European racialism.

No one today in our well-meaning society where racial reality is staunchly denied would be allowed to admit that racialm and not social or religious, considerations are the Jews’ main motive for waging war on humanity. But truth be told, Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881), the Jewish prime minister during the reign of Queen Victoria from 1874 to 1880, was right:

No one must lightly dismiss the question of race. It is the key to world history, and it is precisely for this reason that written history so often lacks clarity — it is written by people who do not understand [or do not want to understand] the race question and what belongs to it.[17]

Thus, you cannot understand globalism or Zionism or the war against us if the racial factor is excluded. Race is real,[18][19] competition between races and individuals is a basic instinct — it’s survival of the fittest — and Jews are exceptionally good at this game. Not because they are more intelligent but because they are better organized and have a higher degree of racial solidarity (hyperethnocentrism). As Wilmot Robertson explains in his book The Dispossessed majority, one of the best contemporary American underground bestsellers ever published,

The truth seems to be that any organized minority with a given amount of intelligence can obtain supremacy over a disorganized majority of equal intelligence. A race-conscious population group is far more effective and successful than in most forms of endeavor than a race-unconscious population group…. To put it in a different perspective, Jewish power may derive as much or more from majority weakness and disorganization as from Jewish strength.[20]

Reality Behind the Myths

After this small digression on race, let’s get back to the main subject of this article: the financing of National Socialism. As conclusively shown by Henry Ashby Turner, big American or German banks and corporations such as J.P. Morgan, I.G. Farben, Flick, Krupp, and Siemens did not, on the whole, support Hitler and his political rise to power:

If the role of big business in the disintegration of the Republic has been exaggerated, such is even more true of its role in the rise of Hitler. While a significant part of the business community contributed materially — if less than wholly voluntarily — to the consolidation of Hitler’s regime after he had become chancellor, he and his party had previously received relatively little support from that quarter. The early growth of the NSDAP took place without any significant aid from the circles of large-scale enterprise.[22]

Big firms and organizations, notes Turner, bestowed the bulk of their funding upon Hitler’s opponents, the bourgeois parties who supported President Hindenburg, the hard-left faction of the National Socialist Party itself, and the Jewish-led German Communist Party.[23]

Who then Financed Hitler and the National Socialist Rise to Power?

Emil Kirdof and Fritz Thyssen were the only German captains of big industry who supported the NSDAP. Most of the party’s money came from the German masses. The American writer on economics and business, Peter Drucker, who agrees with Turner, is quoted as follows by journalist Ivor Benson:

The really decisive backing came from sections of the lower middle classes, the farmers and working class, who were hardest hit; as far as the Nazi Party is concerned, there is good reason to believe that at least three quarters of its funds, even after 1930, came from the weekly dues and from the entrance fees to the mass meetings from which members of the upper classes were always conspicuously absent.[24]

In the final analysis, Hitler was an honest man who wanted the best for his people.

Notes

[19] Steven Pinker, Fear of Race Realism and the Denial of Human Differences, Conference on YouTube.com, 2012.
[20] Wilmot Robertson, The Dispossessed Majority, Howard Allen, 1972, p. 188.
[21] Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, 1stBooks, 2002; Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Antisemitism, 1stBooks, 2004; A People That Shall Dwell Alone. Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy, with Diaspora People, IUniverse, First Edition, 2002.
[22] Henry Ashby Turner, work cited, p. 341.
[23] Ibid, p. 346.
[24] Ivor Benson, work cited, p. 178.

https://nationalvanguard.org/2024/05/was-hitler-controlled-opposition/
https://archive.is/oFbjr

>>93645
On the accusation that magda goebbels was a jewess

This myth is caused by the stupid assumtion on residency card of her adoptive father Richard FriedLander for who it was impossible to ever be a farher of Magda as by the time her mother entered into second marriage after the divorce with Oskar Ritschel she already had cca 5 years (remember second marriage was cca in 1905)
The reason why seprging around Friedlander came in the first place was because of first
>The social shaming over illegitimate children in early 20th century
Which caused the inheritence card found on her residence where for reasons above she was labeled as not a illegitimate child but biological child of that jew
Second because of her first husband we can deduct back she WASNT a child of jew as he demanded from her to reclaim her biological rathers surname before mariage
Third
Nobody ever mentions anything else but that residence card or archive where it was found


>But she dated a jew in early years
There is no evidence it was romantic relationship before that jewish fuck went to palestine only her first marriage was and even then she divorced because of lack of attention to her and family where her man wasnt a jew
>But she met a mason and was buddhist
She wasnt even in nsdap by that time and to this day in prominent institues you can find a members of lodges easily as same as in past
Second there are no reports from peers ever her saying this or them confirming this and historian accusation is empty if not founded on archival finding