>>36940

>moon phases

Interesting, that upper right phase has some white patches. Printing error or some specific intent?

>last image

Lol

>Bradbury

Bradbury was some kind of cult writer in USSR - a rare situation for modern foreign writers in iron curtain times, when only specific western works were printed. Maybe his anti-war stance was the answer, or just his humanist and pacifist style ("action-styled" fiction was very uncommon for ideological reasons, because in future wars don't exist).

For some reason Sheckley also was very popular, I guess even more than on the west, where there were plenty of other writers (Soviet citizens bought any non-standard book they could find, so every serious foreign thing became a hit).

>>36945
>Printing error or some specific intent?
Reminds me of cirrostratus, but I've no lilac fart what could that be.
>Bradbury was some kind of cult writer in USSR
In fact the article in #2 about Bradbury's works was written by a Russian, certain Kirill Andrejev (with Hungarian spelling, couldn't find him quickly with ddg so I gave up).
>in future wars don't exist
Another article in there says the narration in sci-fi changed, there were novels and shorts about wars and destruction, I assume the World Wars' resonance (there were alien civilizations depicted in a way that mirrored Nazi Germany and the imperialist Japan), and then it changed, the encounters between humans and aliens turns to peaceful.

>>36989
I fancy those winglets on those rockets.
>2nd pic
They really wanted to represent all kinds of propulsion of vehicles.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nVOaDfGOPGs [Embed]
>>36990
Sounds like a cool book.

>>36864
Ultimately i switched the order of the initial paragraphs, what do you think?

>>36895
Also put the paragraph about resources into the beggining of rationalisation part. I hope you don't mind.

Late rationalization
<Germany entered the war without the resources to satisfy its military production targets, and arms output did not really take off until February 1940, from which it rose until July and stabilized. In ’42 it entered an exponential growth, the classic phase of the ”Speer miracle”, until the middle of 1943, followed by much slower growth (stagnation in some sectors), a final burst in the first half of 1944 and a slide into oblivion (figure A).

>The paper trail shows bureaucratic infighting through the France-Barbarossa interval, with economic institutions accusing each other of incompetence. This corroborates older data on production and workforce which shows the former not catching up with the latter’s growth, suggesting a decline in productivity. The concluding picture is of early war Germany “squandering its armaments advantage” through ”egotism and incompetence”. But to truly grasp war production in anticipation for Barbarossa it is necessary to know what were its ends and whether it achieved them.

>>36896
The orange paragraph is better placed within the beginning, to leave it clear the late war - early war contrast I'm talking about, the two late periods of exponential growth versus the France-Barbarossa stabilization and the early Poland-France delay.
There's an unnecessary comma in
>but mainly for the decision , to ditch quality for quantity and focus on proven old designs.

so is the kohlzine a project particular to endchan, did it start on kohl and migrate out? or is it a pan /kc/ endeavor for the dissemination of serious discussion and the cultural enrichment of all

>>37032
Started on Kohl.

>1580174116465.gif
むぅ…触手ちんぽ…

>>36988
I'm not sure how much in the trailer, but I think there is more than what you wrote. It can be argued if it is about current or an existing society, or a model of a hypothetical society. There's some talk in the movie itself about it. A little bit naive I think.
There's an allegory of reincarnation there, but I don't think that goes anywhere further.
A couple of plot twist in there, no earth shattering ones, but still, they mostly based on the lack of information the inmates have, or the lies they (perhaps) tell.
Little action, while the whole movie is static, events perk up a bit.
Right now I'm thinking I rewatch, I might missed some tidbits.

I decided I'm gonna rewatch it.

>>36988
Also it's more about compassion and the fact that those who are relatively well off consume more than what they need and live a wasteful life, than the societal allegory the institution in the movie represents.

>>37007
thanks. I'm not really into horror, but might give it a shot.

>>37009
It's a mild horror. Chiefly gore, more can be found on imageboards of that.
Some plotholes in the story, I remember noticing previously but now I'm 20 mins in, discovered some new. Ain't horrible, but I can imagine some might mind them.

>>36985
Okay, yesterday I managed to get over the bulk on my second sit through, and while I'll finish up today, it's enough to say a final verdict. Some spoiler could be below:
It's a motley of crude ideas which fail to unfold in their entirety, and the inconsistencies in the story prevents me to build a speculation on them which could offer a closure to the story. There is no real moral to offer here, even making the ultimate sacrifice doesn't lead to a salvation, and even the promise of change is so thin, making the clemency seem just a pointless act.
I think what the viewer can get out of this really depends on what mindset he/she already has. On the part of the creators and the most likely target audience it might be just a mental masturbation over a topic which won't get ever resolved - similarly to ecological problems and alcoholism how it is mentioned in the article I wrote about here: >>36878 In certain circles it's fashionable to talk about these societal problems, and this movie is a great opportunity to nod knowingly and act deebly goncerned and empathic in front of their peers.
I already wrote, for a horror it's worth a watch (but don't repeat it as I did), I'm gonna hold to this opinion. It's depth is knee high, at least not ankle, but fails to bring us in to the waist.

>>37024
of course they have 8/10 images to so monkeys like you will not notice the fake shit

look i selected not only diamonds but some dirt for you too therefore its legit lol

the classic mix of 80/20

i don't look like a tryhard and thus its not propaganda

im sure even females at dating apps doing this because its a no brainer

>>29428
There it is again. That stupid coconut head album. Like it's supposed to be some diamond in the rough, because of the warm color temperature of the album cover coupled with 10 million fucks saying "You probably haven't heard this". Like it's supposed to be British because they spell it as Aeroplane. Like it's supposed to be an evolution of the Beatles or some other boomer crap because it contains mindless babbling to mindless guitar strumming but with the occasional horns and other crap layered on once in a while to emphasize how bad it is. That "it's the end of the world but I don't care" tone of all hipster music. That "I am an atheist and yet I too listen to boring shit music, because it's the Gospel" attitude. I bet despite all this trying to sound like shit and trying to look humble, some retard points out how technically innovative they are because the singer does some legato once in a while and avoids total cliche. When you're so white you become cryptopretentious for listening to what appears to be a Scottish sound, but don't listen to "crazy shit" ("THATS RACIST!") like Persian or Chinese music (unless it's a genre copied from western pop). This shit is for when you can't listen to any modern 90s+ popular genre because you're afraid to look like you're trying to be cool, you can't listen to Jazz or Classical because you're afraid it of appearing pretentious, you can't listen to Soul because you're afraid it will make you look too SJW, you can't listen to pop because it's just cliches, and you can't listen to Turkic music because you're afraid to look like John McAfee. It's fucking worse than those bands who do one album kind of good and subsequently shit out albums for the next 10 years because their record label promised them money and will market for them while fans argue about whether they're sellouts or not and they maintain a big enough fanbase to survive because of all those fans who "avoid the bigotry, the new stuff is good". And what makes this Indie? Because it's shit? Literally anything with some simple guitar strumming and babbling and terrible voice that just barely manages to be non-traditional, is indie. This whole copypasta can call itself indie and you wouldn't know the difference. That's because music was never not """indie""". GOD DAMNIT. BURN INDIE. REMOVE INDIE. DESTROY INDIE. DAY OF THE ENTERPRISE WHEN

>>37014
at least you can't be a hipster if youre black

>>37016
never heard of donald glover?

>>37014
Here you go bernd. Have the improved and "urbanized" version of the album

I hope it's more up to your taste

https://youtube.com/watch?v=n6IIV5uBCNY [Embed]

>>36846
From the Marxist line it's definitely weird. Another possibility is that those two were included for trolling purposes.

for portuguese there is ptchan (with /int/)

https://ptchan.org
https://ptchan.org/int/

>>36995
Quite a few of Portuguese language board exist. How this is differs from 55, for example? What is this one is about? What dedicated boards it has? How active this chan is? Do they have memes, own lingo?

>>36999
the difference is that its not 55chan

>>36999
PTchan is Portuguese as in from Portugal.

>>36842
eh I met couple pagans and they often acted similar despite having various names
still funny

>>36965
Try to upload that BANANAS.webm again.

>>36966
oghey

>>36975
That's a loaded banana.

>>36756
>>36756
haha this pic is so random and funny. Did you make it Hungarybernd?

>>36785
I'm mentally ill bro.
I only noticed it just now that it's an idiomatic expression thread.
But it's still bad.
Sometimes I want all other Hungarians dead so I can personify our unique suffering incarnate.

>>36803
No. Found it on internets.

>>36806
At 4:50 Sunday, I thought you were drunk. Which is very likely. Beside depressed.
The Hungarian is a sanguine nation, not melancholic. Magyar tűz, szalmaláng (= Hungarian fire, flames of hay). Deep emotions, but passing fast, and changing. But since these are strong emotions it is easy to believe they are the standard.

>>35752
How could I forget the most used one!

-No hi han moros a la costa "There are no moors in the coasr"; comes from the reconquista and the moor raids, it means that ceirtan place is free from unwanted agents

Slovo za slovo, huem po stolu - word for word, dick hit the table

Used to describe the escalation of a conflict, namely the transition from verbal disagreement to physical

Also some recent happening from outskirts of Moscow. Some people had some criminal conflict that resulted in shooting with hunting rifles. Reasons are unknown, although some of them already found by police.
Of course at least half of them are Caucasians (in local terms).

Compared to USA, it is very rare to see any rifle shooting in Russia because civilian arms market is pretty strict and self-defense is almost prohibited. This doesn't stop that type of people though.

>>36949
SHIEEEEEEEEEEET
Good car vs car action too. Keeping the white car in check.
>This doesn't stop that type of people though.
Yeah. Criminals have guns, they have their way to obtain it well criminals who do crimes as a "lifestyle" and not ordinary people who do a onetimer. Even in the US the vast majority of gun related deaths are results of criminal activity. And most guns that used to kill someone has illegal origin one notable exception when cops kill.

>>36957
>And most guns that used to kill someone has illegal origin
From my understanding, most guns used to comit crime are bought legaly by someone who later gives the gun to the criminal. Wich is ilegal, but the guns were still obtained trough a legal method on the first place

>>36960
I dunno about that.
I browsed this: http://www.gunfacts.info/ some time ago. We could check. I looked up once a source of theirs (it was some other topic) and was legit.

>>36961
Okay. At least two pages discuss the source of guns. The "Availability of Guns" and "Crime and Guns". I see somewhat contradictory statements there.
On one side:
>Fact: Five out of six gun-possessing felons obtained handguns from the secondary market and by theft, and “[the] criminal handgun market is overwhelmingly dominated by informal transactions and theft as mechanisms of supply.”
>Fact: The majority of handguns in the possession of criminals are stolen, and not necessarily by the criminals in question. 7 In fact, over 100,000 firearms are stolen in burglaries every year, and most of them likely enter the criminal market (i.e., are sold or traded to criminals).
Against:
>Fact: One study 7of adult offenders living in Chicago or nearby determined that criminals obtain most of their guns through their social network and personal connections. Rarely is the proximate source either direct purchase from a gun store, or even theft. This agrees with other, broader studies of incarcerated felons.
>Fact: Other common arrangements include sharing guns and holding guns for others.
Although the first two doesn't say the criminals who end up using guns acquired through theft, but theft is a method to fill the criminal market. And the criminal market works on the basis of acquaintenance, so yeah, they obtain it through their social network. But into that network these guns enter in illegal ways.