>>20831
>>20829
(Cont)
>I see a woman hitting a man in public, and nobody cares.
I have literally never once seen a woman hit a man in public, or a man hitting a woman in public either for that matter. But having read about this a lot, the reason why even abuse psychologists don't take this as seriously is because the most common explanation is that the woman is reacting to abuse from the man, along with the fact that women's violence is very rarely a threat to men, and most men would laugh if a woman tried to hit them. I'm not saying it makes it right, or any less bad, but this is why it's not taken as seriously in general. On the other hand you have the fact that men who hit their female partners are extremely likely to also rape and/or kill them, but with women hitting men, that's no more likely. Again, I am not saying it's less bad for women to hit men.

>but they're always praised and loved no matter what they look like
This is not true, talk to women about their experiences and you'll learn that the ONLY reason they ever got/get bullied or harassed is for their looks.
>You'd be extremely hard pressed to find a woman who is just too physically unattractive to find a partner.
You are right that they can still get a partner, but that loops us back to what we already covered about men having lower standards and higher sex drives and thus being more desperate for whoever they can manage to get.

>Shit. actual chads who bang women left and right are probably WAY more hateful of women than any "incel".
It depends, but you have a valid point here. Many radical feminists are completely against hookup culture for this reason, they say men who have casual sex see women as objects. I don't think that's universally true but it's common enough to notice. But most "incels" would love to do the same thing if they had the opportunity.