>>41437
>logical conclusion that all ratings like that are arbitrary and not in any way objective
No, dumbass. YOU'RE retarded. Giving an unattractive person a high\perfect rating doesn't mean the ratings are arbitrary, it means the person is giving a wrong rating. People are being stupid, and you think the issue is the ratings. It's like when people hate guns, when the real issue is irresponsible individuals.
And of course when the retard can't make a counter argument, he tries to run away from the conversation, of course claiming he still "won".
It's quite interesting how similarly women and retarded men act sometimes. Not sure if baiting or genuinely stupid.