>>41655
>You don't understand.
No, you don't understand that there is no objective way of rating the looks.
Hence why I said, this discussion with you and your ilk is pointless.

>The fucking irony of a delusional person who doesn't understand the difference between "subjective" and "objective", telling me that what I'm saying isn't based on reality. You are not even mentally capable of understanding how stupid you're being.
Right back at you, homie.
Right back at you.

But I'm glad I made you have a raging hateboner.

>>41660
>always
Who are you quoting?