>>41671
>there is no objective way of rating the looks
LITERALLY too stupid to understand objectivity. And so solipsistic that you assume everyone else thinks the way you do. And so arrogant that you refuse to listen. A prime example of what I'm talking about. A person literally too stupid to discuss topics.
>No, you
>Right back at you, homie.
A "no u". legit a middle school level comeback. I estimate that you have an IQ of ~90. Still capable of navigating the world, but too stupid to engage in any depth.
Here's an IQ test for you: If a woman has dated and had kids with 5 abusive men, is it more efficient to address the woman, or men?
>your ilk
>discussion (...) is pointless
>raging hateboner
Continue to eat shit, r*ddit retard scum of the earth. I hope you learn to be less retarded.