>>5245
>since you're the smartest guy in the room I hope you realize that your whole argument revolving around intentions is based on the attempt to make a groundless, sweeping generalization about what you consider to be the stereotypical communist personality

There you go again, presuming other people's intent without regard for context. Anon posted "commie whore.jpg" and defined "communist" in an overtly tongue in cheek way.

For this obvious shitpost to have been "sistematically disproven by history" you'd have to believe that this is their literal definition of what a true communist is when clearly they just meant "insufferable people who identify as communists" (see image). That's why this has nothing to do with what the communist ideology "actually says" and why you don't get to call him an idiot while being so presumptuous yourself.

Like I said, it was a shitpost and hyperbole's a pretty common device around these parts (in case you weren't aware). It being a stereotype would mean you'd have to assume they can't distinguish what they're making fun of and the real thing and you simply don't know.

>I think I've spotted the idiot
WOW YEAH MAN THAT'S A SICK BURN!!! YOU REALLY DUNKED ON THAT KID'S DECONSTRUCTION OF THE AVERAGE COMMUNIST ENJOYER MEME. BET HE (OR SHE!) WON'T GET SO MUCH AS A B MINUS ON THIS TERM'S POLITICAL SCIENCE PAPER!!!