>>37938
>durrr pedo site
someone hasn't read clearly. they have stated they DON'T allow illegal content, like, pedo/zoophilia. Drawings are NOT part of them.
>>37939
No, you don't "just know", idiot. You've repeated the same shit year after year, and I'm not the weird arm flailing guy. Cuase you're on the internet reading news from 9 years ago doesnt mean its about your victims... leave me out of this.
>>37940
>t-that means he did-
I think it did mean that. The only way was to delete it so you don't stalk the page for CLEARLY FICTIONAL CONTENT.
>o-o-only to concea-
You sound paranoid, do you want me to help you?
>you're bound to fi-
You won't. You're only "shaming" me because I draw fictional content. And for the record, I don't like "zoocat" or "ezra". I havent even drawn enabling art for MAPs and actual animl fuckers, so what's the point of shaming me just for ironically following, huh? I follow people, but it doens't mean I always engage on their content (unless what, they're not a -phile).
>>37942
See? Repeating yourself. You have a problem, Klim.