Anonymous 06/04/2026 (Thu) 14:17 No.220049 del
>>220024
In Germany, 43%–48% of forests are privately owned, and everyone is trying to maintain this balance. Logging for industrial purposes naturally takes place only on private lands; state-owned forests exist to preserve the ecosystem, and logging there is limited to sanitary thinning. I’ve actually worked in forestry and can say that Estonia has the best forest management; there, almost all trees are digitized and recorded in a database, and forestry education is quite high-quality. I believe the amount of forest should be regulated on a scientific basis.
> In Estonia, the concept of “everyone’s right to nature” (Igaüheõigus) has been taken to its fullest extent thanks to RMK’s infrastructure. The organization has built and maintains a vast network free of charge for residents and tourists.
My home region is losing its forests and not restoring them, the habitats of indigenous peoples are being buried in sand, and the shores are eroding, while the rivers are drying up. Russia deliberately killed forestry science; even in the Soviet Union, people understood that forests needed to be restored, but these Satanists, led by Pyn, are simply destroying everything they touch—a shit-Midas.

Pics Source:
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Proportion-of-forest-land-in-sub-national-public-ownership-by-country_fig1_328260793

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Pattern-of-Forest-Ownership-in-Selected-Forest-Rich-Countries_fig3_255657467

I think this is exactly the indicator that reflects “private property rights.”