>>2604
>Participation in any religion makes one God's enemy.
<pushes a religion
>The Creator Himself personally condemns by name the self-proclaimed "apostle to the Gentiles" and founder of the Christian religion, Paul, aka Sha'uwl of Tarsus.
<denies much of the New Testament
>There are three possible destinies for the human soul, not just two, as the most popular religions teach.
Chapter and verse?

Looking around their website, it's oozes of cult like behavior, like say insisting that the name of God is a pronunciation and therefore those that believe in a different name in a different language is not the same God despite being a valid translation. A name to God can only describe an attribute but not God in and of itself that is beyond descriptions. In a similar sense, God is not bound to one specific religion. What kind of an evil "God" would grant salvation to only one specific tribe? The reason why many Christians and even Jews insist that at a certain point humanity was of one people and one language via Babylon under Nimrod which Abram (brahma) fled from, as well prior to the flood which Noah escaped from. In a sense, escaping destruction is always their theme, which the rapture concept is also a sense of escape of destruction which can only be done through the escape of their own "sins" which also can only be done through blaming it on the blameless one which Jesus Christ represents the sacrificial atonement practices in imputing one's sins into an innocent animal to psychologically accept their own failures as not a part of who they are for it's dead. This is also why Catholics rationalize the passover feast communion bread to be the literal body of christ whom they perpetually keep him dead on the cross, so that they can then also justify their own incompetency to Jesus Christ. This blame game had been shifted to blaming the Jews in /pol/ as their means of their existential "salvation", therefore, justifies murdering of Jews since it would make their immediate physical lives better, so the means to that physical salvation is also justified for the "greater good". The blame cult cannot build society based on the foundation of all that is true, because they still think that there needs something to be blamed for the mortal condition when in reality, their very existence is without cognitive blame, nobody can really blame others for existing just as they can't really blame themselves for also existing. There is no "original sin", no prima causa. There's no condemnation to those that seek to make babies as much as there's no condemnation to those that can't make babies from a divine viewpoint, though there is a practicality blame put onto others like saying that it's impractical to not make babies if we want to have a sustaining population with an equally sustainable culture and ideals that was cultivated through time.