>>2690
>though I think it wouldn't seem so special anymore and people would actually understand it.
That's not the case, it's not special just because it doesn't use the profane vocabulary that people use and corrupt which the dialectic language relies on strict grammar to convey nuances not understood by many. The truth itself is banned by both religious/creationist and secular/nihilist institutions, seen as "heterodox" when people are exposed to the claims without understanding the methodology itself is neither inductive nor deductive. Say anything true to religious or secular academics and they go berserk, for they have been co-opted by idiots.

>>2698
These concepts aren't new, they're only new to you, yet the truth itself is timeless.

The attributes of the soul is not the soul, neither does it make up the soul. Conflating the brain with the soul is the materialist fallacy.

Descriptions are not explanations, while even if I just tell you what it is, you have frequently denied and failed to understand it, it's beyond physicality itself.