>>2753
>Insisting the New Testament isn't oblivious to race is cherrypicking.
Isn't entirely oblivious to race. But yes, it is cherry-picking and the NT doesn't really seem to see it as important, even though it is.
>Again, you have a low attention span, reread what I've posted,
Yes, sorry. I should read more before having an opinion, most of the time I'm simply guessing at the truth ...