>>2857
I have recommended this book before in regards to Biblical chronology and the story of creation, namely:
"Pre-glacial man and the Aryan race" (1887) by Lorenzo Burge
The author thinks that the original source of the NT is far older, and has been misinterpreted, mistranslated or corrupted by the people who were tasked with translating or communicating those older sources.
But I only have read the first few pages (I have a habit of not finishing things ...) so I'd need to finish the book before recommending it.
Might there have been a far older source for the bible itself, you think?