>>37259
>You said it was from insects, then from factories. You don't really believe in anything.
I never said it wasn't from insects. I claimed that insects are intoxicated by the fumes and then easily spread them to plants when making contact, which they do quite a lot in-fact. Now you're trying to claim I'm inconsistent.
>Orange mold was colonizing entire oranges when the Danes were still in tribal life.
Is there any proof for this? Oranges are a relatively recent fruit, they never even existed in their current state until the colonial period, right around the corner when it comes to the time the industrial revolution began.
>If there's x toxin, 1 billion cells and the toxin spreads equally each cell will have x/1 billion. It will not have x. The total quantity of toxin remains the same.
And what makes you assume the amount of toxicity has to be divided? Either they're intoxicated equally in a small amount, or they're intoxicated in varying small amounts. What makes you think that?
>the effect is observably pretty much the same.
The "effect" is a result of the fungus's detox procedure. An equivalent for men is not the actual effect of a toxic reaction or lead poisoning alone, but a detox procedure after that, with bacteria or fungi/parasites. Malaria for example, it's caused by a mosquito carrying a parasite, but it itself is actually a detox procedure.