Bernd
06/08/2020 (Mon) 15:49:36
No.37539
del
06/08/2020 (Mon) 15:49:36
No.37539
del
>>37536
Everything is just hearsay. Miles does have a CV and a past, which POM covered in extreme detail quite recently (with no real response from Miles aside from insults), and they supposedly met him. Since he lives in the middle of nowhere in New Mexico, nobody knows about him and it's too irrelevant to be concerned about, aside from both being shills, especially being linked by the jew Josh, who might be the chief behind all this mess to begin with.
Regarding his Unabomber paper, whether it was faked or not, I believe that a the prime objective regarding all psy-ops around him is to distract people from his actual ideology and instead focus on the fact that he bombed a bunch of people. Miles claims that his anti-industrialism made him an "Anti" or an agent specifically intended to discredit anti-industrialism, but at the same time, Miles does nothing about industrialism and even makes his readers more susceptible to it, which plays in to the technocratic agenda. At the same time, Miles is very careful to defend liberalism, which is probably because he's intended for older audiences, being an older person and all. He claims that feminism was blackwashed (and isn't bad or a psyop to begin with, mostly enabled by industrialism), and also claims that the hippies were infiltrated, when in-reality the hippies were never legitimate, they were fake "anti-racists" during the Civil Rights movement, which ties right into JFK. He accuses everyone criticising him for liberalism of being a "fascist", while not accepting any legitimate criticism of it, instead, literally resorting to the No True Scotsman fallacy.
http://mileswmathis.com/liberal.pdf
>As it turns out, the founding fathers were not liberal at all. They were fascists
Other "truther" movements are shills as well, and Miles calls them out, but then again, he's doing the same thing. It's not even about money or power, but it's to change their method of executing power via transitioning to a cosmopolitan industrial hell filled with mongrels.
>>37538
He does provide real proof sometimes, but usually just cross-references with the peerage and assumes that since they have similar names, they must be related. It's odd that he pushes that so many spooks have real names, but then again, there are people like Putin who have no official genealogy.
Germ theory and cell theory (though plant cells are real)are simply used to both shape the minds of people and ruin their physical health, combined with all the toxins spread by industrial cities.
Everything is just hearsay. Miles does have a CV and a past, which POM covered in extreme detail quite recently (with no real response from Miles aside from insults), and they supposedly met him. Since he lives in the middle of nowhere in New Mexico, nobody knows about him and it's too irrelevant to be concerned about, aside from both being shills, especially being linked by the jew Josh, who might be the chief behind all this mess to begin with.
Regarding his Unabomber paper, whether it was faked or not, I believe that a the prime objective regarding all psy-ops around him is to distract people from his actual ideology and instead focus on the fact that he bombed a bunch of people. Miles claims that his anti-industrialism made him an "Anti" or an agent specifically intended to discredit anti-industrialism, but at the same time, Miles does nothing about industrialism and even makes his readers more susceptible to it, which plays in to the technocratic agenda. At the same time, Miles is very careful to defend liberalism, which is probably because he's intended for older audiences, being an older person and all. He claims that feminism was blackwashed (and isn't bad or a psyop to begin with, mostly enabled by industrialism), and also claims that the hippies were infiltrated, when in-reality the hippies were never legitimate, they were fake "anti-racists" during the Civil Rights movement, which ties right into JFK. He accuses everyone criticising him for liberalism of being a "fascist", while not accepting any legitimate criticism of it, instead, literally resorting to the No True Scotsman fallacy.
http://mileswmathis.com/liberal.pdf
>As it turns out, the founding fathers were not liberal at all. They were fascists
Other "truther" movements are shills as well, and Miles calls them out, but then again, he's doing the same thing. It's not even about money or power, but it's to change their method of executing power via transitioning to a cosmopolitan industrial hell filled with mongrels.
>>37538
He does provide real proof sometimes, but usually just cross-references with the peerage and assumes that since they have similar names, they must be related. It's odd that he pushes that so many spooks have real names, but then again, there are people like Putin who have no official genealogy.
Germ theory and cell theory (though plant cells are real)are simply used to both shape the minds of people and ruin their physical health, combined with all the toxins spread by industrial cities.