>>37940
Neither do I, but it's a possibility, things are close. However, they said that they were talking a lot, and there aren't many people here trying to defend him. In that case, it's that they're possibly false-flagging in-order to increase their reputation. Anyways, aside from that, there should be enough talk on Miles already. He's already been outed as a spook (assuming he's an entity with a real name) trying to bait in gullible people, as with the vast-majority of the "truth movement", whether they identify as such or not. Unless there are people from the forum trying to shill for Miles here, that shouldn't be a problem to actually write about anymore.