>>45663
The term "revolution" is sorta overused. It's a tool of justification basically. This is why I emphasized the radical changes in my description. I see Luttwak's point about popular movement, and it can be incorporated to what I wrote.
If I were among of the leaders of the 1964 coup, I would also call it a revolution, for practical reasons, and act as if it was true. I wouldn't even feel as a hypocrite because doing that would be necessity.
Here and now I can't call it a revolution. It's justification, and legitimization tactic. I do not condemn them doing it.