Bernd
03/17/2022 (Thu) 21:40:15
No.46969
del
03/17/2022 (Thu) 21:40:15
No.46969
del
>>46960
>why wasn't it shot down?
1. It was Ukrainian, considered friendly.
2. It was Russian, then it would have been an act of aggression.
Probably came without any warning or information or broadcast or I dunno, probably even without a warning from some NATO higher up who already knew it's in the air and it's expected course due to their gadgets, so the air defense of the countries just followed and did not dare to do anything with it not to cause some diplomatic complication or WW III. They saw what happens next and nothing much happened.
>why wasn't it shot down?
1. It was Ukrainian, considered friendly.
2. It was Russian, then it would have been an act of aggression.
Probably came without any warning or information or broadcast or I dunno, probably even without a warning from some NATO higher up who already knew it's in the air and it's expected course due to their gadgets, so the air defense of the countries just followed and did not dare to do anything with it not to cause some diplomatic complication or WW III. They saw what happens next and nothing much happened.