cont. >>49473

But back to relationships.
There are these couples, they say:
>we make decisions together
The woman decides. You can take poison to that.
Oh they might talk over their life how to do it, but there will be one who'll wait the other to nod the decision, and only then the action can take place. There is always a command structure.
But here comes the fun part. Not necessarily the one who nods in the end is the one who decides. That person mind can be made up by the other, and the nod, is simply just giving in to the will of the other. There was this Hungarian king, Czech in origin, nicknamed as "Dobre" Ladislaus, because he was so impotent king he could only nod and say dobre, dobre - "okay, okay" - on every whim of the whole court and pressure groups.
Women like to get their way, but they often practice soft power, influence their men, rather than direct, open control and ordering around. When they in power they are women, not imitating men, they do it their own way, how evolution made them capable of it. It's the feminist pipe dream: women who are in place of men, acting like men; this isn't the reality, it's rare. Still as individuals of higher tier animals, they do go after control.

Here >>49261 and here >>49263 books are came up, what women prefer. While I have not read any of such books I think the stories aren't about The Man use the heroin the female hero not the drug, and discard her for the next hole, but are about The Man dominating the heroin, then the woman (gradually) win him over and make him have her as the center of his obsession, domesticating, taming him, to stay monogamous with her. Or some such.