>>16101 Hm, thanks >>16103 >that everything "primal", "raw" and "ancestral" is automatically healthy because that's what cavemen would eat Aajonus LITERALLY never said this. He didn't model his diet around what was le primal, this is a myth and he modeled his diet around what worked best for him. Also saying that everything he said is entirely disproven because it's some kind of appeal to nature "fallacy" is LITERALLY a fallacy itself. Yes, i admit that studies on raw meat on humans themselves basically don't exist (if you ignore the thousands of people who are on a rawprimal diet and don't suffer from anything) however there have been endless studies on animals with raw meat showing how raw meat/milk is beneficial. There are also other parts of the primal diet that have been proven true aside from raw meat. Im not treating Aajonus like a god here im just saying that a lot of his work has a degree of truth. Also >Ray Peat mogs this fraud easily If you mean that Ray Peat is the male of the group then you're retarded because Aajonus looked physically superior to Peat, in any scenario he would've been the male of the group. https://aajonus.net/primal-studies >The digestive benefits of raw meat have been studied by A M Ugolev in 1984. (Page 19-21 of his book “Theory of Adequate Nutrition” that contains all his scientific experiments) https://aajonus.net/ugolev-raw-frog-study https://freelibrary.ru/bookread/287574-aleksandr-ugolev-teoriya-adekvatnogo-pitaniya-i/page-5 >Potenger's cat study on cats who ate cooked meat versus those who ate raw meat https://www.ectownusa.net/mineralcountynevada/docs/Potenger%27s%20Cats%20book%20review.pdf
