>>3900
>implying I'm not capable of masking my identity
That is not what I'm talking about, I'm pretty sure all of us have at least decent enough OPSEC that they wouldn't be traced without a subpoena to the ISP at least.
I'm talking about people just writing how they write normally, which is quite regular, both on their online supposedly unconnected accounts. There are certain words and phrases that can be traced along there and probably even more with an actual heuristic that does indepth analysis.
>generic website of normie coomers
I barely visit places like that so I genuinely don't know how normal that is.
>I dont understand pushing for/hoping one specifically starts doing NSFW content
I know why they're doing it, I just vehemently disagree with it on multiple levels.
>she's been focused on her online social medias.
Tbh if she doesn't nuke it, it's not the end of the world in entertainment industry to show that off as the thing that's been paying the bills, especially since it was all SFW.