>>4004
>yeah, I almost thought that it was the art of image macros for reacting towards X post.
TBH, I don't know what it is. I have more intent behind it than a mere joke, but for me to follow through would have been behaving pretty confusingly. It's an itch that I want to scratch in some form however.

>that doesn´t require so much mystery. Derpimods having a mental breakdown on their meta decisions is almost a tradition that barely surprises anyone at this point. I guess that happened because of requests from sensible users that didn´t want to have any negative reception towards their own work.
I really need to pay better attention to them. Perhaps I'll find more. Though I'm not sure my questioning of them woull fit into /go/ being a place for records over "editorial" content, if we want to go that route.

>about that topic, yeah, this is probably the strangest event that one can report from their practices.
I reread it and still scratch my head. It doesn't even seem like that major of an issue if they were worried if the other show would take over FiM. It still wouldn't make sense to ban it outright with the broad criteria they themselves set but the BS excuses and saying the other company was shady and rip offs were bad, that really is what bugs me, and confuses me as well.

>I had...
Stick it to the MAN.

As for Luna, did she through a drunken party and set Canterlot on fire just to mess with her sister and Shining?
Now I can't put it past her.