>>7582
>I've mentioned them
Oh yeah, I listened to some of this because of you!

> because the managers at ASoS are responsible to protect their 'brand' and there are few other means of doing it besides the atomic banhammer of the DMCA.
I actually understand the perspective. Even if not a source of revenue I can understand protecting that in principle or for legal reason over making an exception for something that doesn't make money least piracy is encouraged later on*. Problem lies with if/when some of this stuff disappears.

*Powerful counterpoint I can come up with to that but I am too lazy to atm.
**Need to go in what I consider the ethics of this more thoroughly sometime.

>But there are simpler explanations available.
Indeed, for this, it is merely the actions of ASOS.

>>7584
>Such perversions are unfit for our society.
And the metric system.