>>2387
>traumatized by losing info
Not an excuse, in fact that should be MORE incentive to archive stuff, so we don't lose it again.

>>2388
Yes, archive offline, for sure. But for other anons - archiving stuff online is important as well, so it's available for other anons to archive offline as well (more people, more archives). We're entering a new phase and the level of desperation will only continue to rise, leading to more things being scrubbed from the web, altered or whatnot.

>>2409
Some sites make it as difficult as possible to archive because they don't want to be held accountable for the bullshit they spew! Chief among these is WaPo. In these cases, archive.org is better than archive.fo