>>18256
>>18257
I'm not certain these actually violate the global rules, since no direct form of intercourse is actually being depicted despite the obvious implication of the third image. I'm not sure if the presence of white fluid constitutes a depiction of sexual conduct, So I'm going to spoiler them for now (for those of you who don't want to see that), if admin deletes them then I'll include that class of image in the "delete on sight" category for the future. Sorry to disappoint, but that image is a very strange case. I will however say the appeal is lost on me. Not sure if people generally would prefer that kind of thing be removed anyways.