>>294 You're thinking about it wrong way. The "no spam" rule is useless as explained above.
The on-topic rule is harmful. No one is qualified to act as a quality control on an imageboard, no one besides Anonymous themselves. Anonymous that relinquishes his right to self moderate ends up as whiny, dull, mod reliant faggot.
Let's say OP wants to talk about movies of David Lynch. He'll post on here but either he won't get any replies or they will be offtopic (or in case of /v/ tier boards pathetic whines) so OP will realise video game board might not be the place to find people that would like to talk about topic he's interested in. In case he's retarded he'll attempt to start a thread couple times more but the community will act roughly the same - disinterested.
