/b/ - Random

Anything posted here are autistic works of fiction, only a fool would take them seriously.

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Board Rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Magrathea | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


Anonymous 01/01/2024 (Mon) 00:55 [Preview] No. 49288
Pedophilia is kinda bad in the same way doing drugs is bad. It is especially bad in large doses; in small doses it is basically harmless. I find it odd and I don't understand why so many Twitter/YouTube/normie people get so upset or up-in-arms over stuff that's even slightly pedophilic or pedophile-adjacent. Like someone jerking off to drawings, they get mad. Or someone trying to get with a 16 or 17-year-old girl, they say he's a weirdo. Or if you bring up the point that age of consent is different in various jurisdictions across the world, they say "cringe".

It is like they are NPCs or bootlickers in regards to the law. Human sexuality is not "bad" or "good" OR "on" or "off" just based on whether or not the person or depiction of a person is above or under the age of 18 and judging the reaction someone has.

This is maybe anti-family or like prudes being jealous that some guy gets with an older teenage girl. What's the point of money if you can't get rich or enjoy it? What's the point of sex if you can't have it with beautiful sexy young women? I say anti-family because allowing 16-or-17-year-olds to get married and have kids is pro-family; a man who wants to do that with a young woman of that age is not a weirdo, just some guy who may have to put up with the bitch's immaturity.

Maybe some of this is normalfags need something to cast their sins upon and hate, like how centuries ago people did human/animal sacrifices. They would put their negativity upon the animal, like a scapegoat, then kill it. In Christianity, for example, people routinely ask God to take their sins away to be free of them. People need this type of outlet, so I can see pedo hate/dislike partly filling this need. Witch-hunts and such.

If girls below the age of 16 or 17 get pregnant they or their child could die, so that's really a no-no. Even getting pregnant at 16 or 17 might be bad, but I think that is more up to individual choice. Relations with 16 or 17 year olds seems OK, but any younger than that I am basically against. Perhaps if they got explicit permission from both families (and probably also gotta follow the law) <16-year-olds could get married or whatever with whoever. I am partly thinking about countries where age of consent law allows for <16.

Other than that, the human ability to reason should not be understated. If you think people cannot make good or good-enough choices, then you are kinda babying them. Anyone with half a brain can consent, but legally speaking, consent does not matter ("can't consent") in some cases because the law is a force for positive socialization. (Or at least the law is supposed to be a force to avoid negative social affairs.)

I posted this because I think it is a somewhat interesting topic. Image: if you do a DuckDuckGo image search for "pedobear" you will get no results.


Anonymous 01/01/2024 (Mon) 00:56 [Preview] No.49289 del
Only one image per OP


Anonymous 01/01/2024 (Mon) 07:42 [Preview] No.49294 del
absolutely, pedophilia isnt even the right word for it, because pedophilia means a person that is attracted to prepubescent children, meaning before puberty meaning that it'd be 6-10 year olds for pedophilia. hebephilia would be closer but that is like 11-14 year olds. ephebophilia is the word that these people are looking for, which is attraction to 15-19 year olds. the word pedophilia is overused and isn't even used in the right way most of the time.


Anonymous 01/01/2024 (Mon) 08:01 [Preview] No.49296 del
>>49295
So was beating people to death if they annoyed you.


Anonymous 01/01/2024 (Mon) 08:19 [Preview] No.49297 del
>>49294
OP here; I agree. I thought to write something like that in the OP but didn't.


Anonymous 01/01/2024 (Mon) 13:35 [Preview] No.49299 del
>>49289
Brave image search: less shitty censorship than DuckDuckGo


Anonymous 01/01/2024 (Mon) 13:43 [Preview] No.49300 del
>>49299
Cringe censorship recorded here (picrel):
https://archive.ph/2024.01.01-133758/https://duckduckgo.com/?q=pedobear&t=iphone&ia=images&iax=images
(No results also with each safety setting of off, strict, moderate)

Other images from Google Image Search.


Anonymous 01/03/2024 (Wed) 02:42 [Preview] No.49335 del
An example would be the way some react to the recent Yandere Dev situation. Here's one video from this one guy who comes from a totalitarian shitskin culture:
Yandere Dev Made The First Apology of 2024...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zmKS1s2W8hU [Embed]

I suppose he's right on most things in that video, but some things in that video and other videos he made on Yandere Dev come off as stupid. Probably shouldn't be talking to <18-year-old people on the Internet in a sexual way. That is maybe ethically questionable or could lead to something bad. It is definitely not illegal and it is maybe not ethically wrong to listen to whatever sexual thing someone under 18 say to you. As an adult, it might be wrong to say sexual things to someone under 18 on the Internet. "Child Grooming Law and Legal Definition":
https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/child-grooming/ = https://archive.ph/kkkTd
>In the U.S. child grooming is considered a federal offence pursuant to 18 USCS § 2422. the provision of the section reads as “(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
>(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life”.
So a question would be about "any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense" - what falls into this definition? What if you have a sexual conversation with someone under 18 on the Internet without trying to persuade them to come fuck you IRL or get them to send you sexual images/videos of themselves? So basically just talk without trying to get any IRL interaction or IRL sexual material.

In zmKS1s2W8hU he said that adults should never talk about genitals to a minor. But what about sex education in schools? Also obviously siblings talk about whatever sexually graphic stuff with each other, what if one's above 18 and one isn't? I know on the Internet it is different, but still. And if you live in an state where age of consent is 16 or 17, talking to a 16-or-17-year-old in whatever way is fine as long as nothing is happening in an interstate way. The interstate thing is a federal guideline, not a state one. Or, conversations with 16-or-17-year-olds in some ways is illegal if online and in the same state even with age of consent being 16 or 17, but then it is fine if none of the conversation happened online. So in that case you could talk to 16 or 17 year olds in any way in a state where age of consent=16 or 17 and none of the conversation happened via the Internet.


Anonymous 01/03/2024 (Wed) 02:52 [Preview] No.49337 del
>>49335
>guy who comes from a totalitarian shitskin culture
More crap from that guy:
YandereDev Is In Serious Trouble...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wDaufMnafpI [Embed]
YandereDev Responded...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=m2Y4nX8flUY [Embed]

I think I watched one of those videos but not the other. In zmKS1s2W8hU and one of the above two videos, he was insistent that Yandere Dev be investigated. What is he, the FBI? In the past SomeOrdinaryGamers said something like "people who drive cars really fast in residential areas should be locked up for life." Like, nigger, WTF?


Anonymous 01/03/2024 (Wed) 03:06 [Preview] No.49338 del
It's because parents don't like the idea of their offspring having sex because they want to retain their innocence (for the most part). Young people get jealous of older people getting with their crushes (usually because the older person has a car, money, or maturity itself).

All criticisms are founded on envy.


Anonymous 01/03/2024 (Wed) 03:08 [Preview] No.49339 del
>>49337
Some semi-stupid comments on those videos:

Having a sexual interest in a 17.9999-year-old = "morally aberrant behavior and makes you a freak"
>@ycleptprof.5249
>
>I knew a man who was desperately lonely and looking for love. And I was the minor in that situation. The only difference is that, when he discovered that he was a whole decade older than me (27), he was like, "Yeah, sorry, this is weird, man." And that was the last time we spoke.
>
>That's how an adult handles that situation. He was a cool and respectful guy. He didn't give himself license to be a freak because "17 is 94% of 18" or some weird shit. You don't justify morally aberrant behavior with your own personal issues.
>
>Edit: grammar
>3 months ago (edited) | 3,574 likes

No one can have sex until everyone involved is age 25
>@PeeperSnail
>
>YanDev’s argument about the age of consent ironically supports it being RAISED, not lowered. By stating that there’s people older than 18 who aren’t emotionally and mentally prepared for intimate relationships implies laws need to be stricter and expand what legally counts as a minor, at least in terms of intercourse.
>
>3 months ago | 1,040 likes

Comparatively feeling good or self-righteous about yourself in regards to other "weaker/lesser people"
>@theabysswalker114
>
>Yandev is basically just a achievement check, when u hear about him u just check what you have accomplished since the development of yandere simulator started and feel better
>
>2 months ago | 228

----

Other comments:

"only illegal if you report it"
>@l00visa
>
>Could we stop calling it a mistake… dropping something is a mistake, forgetting to ask how old someone is could be a mistake, knowing the person is underage and saying “it’s only illegal if you report it” is not a mistake. It’s a deliberate action. Not a mistake! Just a fucked up action that he chose to do even though he knew it was wrong.
>
>2 months ago | 568 likes

"victims"
>@chibivampiregirl
>
>It makes me so sad reading the victim's statement where she tries to downplay and excuse his actions by saying that she sought him out, not the other way around... normal, well-adjusted adults don't do that. She's blaming herself for the actions of a 35 year old man. She's saying that people are "manipulating her into thinking she's a grooming victim", but she IS a grooming victim. It's so hard for a lot of minors to understand that it's not their fault in any way, shape, or form when something like this happens. An adult should recognize the power imbalance, recognize how wildly inappropriate it is, and not talk to the minor, let alone make disgusting sexual comments. It's not her fault, but she is a grooming victim, even if she doesn't want to view it that way.
>
>2 months ago | 201 likes


Anonymous 01/03/2024 (Wed) 03:22 [Preview] No.49340 del
Related
The U.S. Government Wants To Control Online Speech to “Protect Kids”
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/08/us-government-about-control-speech-online-protect-kids = https://archive.ph/gMcXO
>The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), a bill that allows for a wide range of government penalties for online speech, could soon be passed by Congress. If that happens, the access we have to information may be forever changed. KOSA will make state prosecutors and federal bureaucrats the final arbiters of online content moderation in the U.S.
>KOSA is fundamentally a censorship bill. Politicians are justifying it by harping on something we all know—that there’s content online that’s inappropriate for kids. But instead of letting tricky questions about what online content is appropriate at what age be decided by parents and families, politicians are stepping in to override us.
>TAKE ACTION
>SAY NO TO STATE-CONTROLLED INTERNET IN THE U.S.
>The U.S. Government Will Ban “Depressing” Content
>The heart of the KOSA bill is a “Duty of Care” that the government forces on every website, app, social network, message forum, and video game. (It’s Section 2 in the bill text.) KOSA will compel even the smallest online forums to take action against content that politicians believe will cause minors “anxiety,” “depression,” or encourage substance abuse, among other behaviors.
>[...]
>KOSA Throws Out Good Speech With “Bad”
>KOSA will punish people for having online conversations. It empowers every state’s attorney general as well as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to file lawsuits against websites or apps that the government believes are failing to “prevent or mitigate” the list of bad things that could influence kids online.
>[...]
>There’s Only One Internet, and KOSA Will Censor All of It
>KOSA’s promise to leave the “adult” internet alone is an utterly empty one. There’s no real way to apply these rules only to minors without creating a special “kids site”—and even then, a website operator will have to be worried about government action. It is likely to see some teenagers who lie about their age, or just stay quiet about it. EFF opposes mandatory age-verification, which is a bad idea for many reasons, including the fact that it takes away adults’ right to talk to each other anonymously.
>[...]
>KOSA isn’t Different From Removing “Depressing” Books Out Of The Library
>We all know there’s content online that’s harmful, and inappropriate for kids. Ideally, parents and families should decide what online content is appropriate for what age, and what is off-limits. Every day, parents and kids (and all adults) make decisions about what to view, and whether and how much to limit screen time. These personal and family decisions are incredibly important, but we’ve never allowed the government to set rules and punishments around them—until now, if KOSA passes.
>[...]
>We hope more members of Congress will understand that KOSA is a censorship bill that will put kids in danger, not help them.


Anonymous 01/03/2024 (Wed) 14:16 [Preview] No.49342 del
>>49335
Under such harsh laws as those why are tranny groomers in public schools allowed to sexually harass children as early as 7 years old without being charged? Seems to me we have a completely politicized and weaponized judicial system today.


Anonymous 01/03/2024 (Wed) 14:23 [Preview] No.49343 del
>>49340
Here they go again, trying to censor away and destroy the internet. This has NOTHING to do with protecting anyone! They just want total control over online content just like the Chinese government has in China!


Anonymous 01/03/2024 (Wed) 14:54 [Preview] No.49345 del
anti-glow spam bump


Anonymous 01/08/2024 (Mon) 04:45 [Preview] No.49406 del
>>49337
"YouTube Shut Down The Channel Uploading CP..."
https://youtube.com/watch?v=_LQFo7kEj8g [Embed]
>is illegal to seek illegal content.
LOL, what a retard. You can do whatever searches trying to find something, that's not illegal. The only illegal act would be if you tried to hire a hitman to murder someone, and that isn't "content".


Anonymous 01/08/2024 (Mon) 04:49 [Preview] No.49407 del
>>49406
Other than stupid statement "it is illegal to seek illegal content", he also said, "it is illegal to view illegal content." Also wrong, possession is more of an infraction. Simply viewing could happen accidentally and to anyone.

>hire a hitman to murder someone
Made me think about "darkweb hitmen" which is currently entirely a scam. Maybe in the future deepweb hitmen will be an actually thing. Interesting sci-fi topic/idea.


Anonymous 01/08/2024 (Mon) 05:01 [Preview] No.49408 del
>why do I care what crap some JewTuber saws about whatever
I shouldn't. But he has a significant reach and I have some interest in the law and peoples' rights. Schizo idea: what if people like him are part of a psyop to normalize privacy-disrespecting technology in order for laws to be passed to get around encryption to "protect the children". And what does this guy do all day anyways? Talk about and play stupid video games then cover stupid drama, like about who's a pedo. He looks for CP-related stuff, he's the pedo. That's one possibility. Remember some Christian pastors who were really outspoken about homosexuality then turn out to be homos themselves? Other possibility: he's filling that "cybercrime"/"hacking" niche market in YouTube for money.


Anonymous 01/08/2024 (Mon) 05:04 [Preview] No.49409 del
>>49408
says about whatever *

>>49407
>that scifi idea
Saw that in this one stupid streaming series


Anonymous 01/08/2024 (Mon) 06:08 [Preview] No.49410 del
Was researching that hitman concept and saw this video which is not related to that specific idea, but still of interest
The Hunt for the King of the Dark Web
https://youtube.com/watch?v=gq01C2kjMiM [Embed]

Thoughts: Alex used an iPhone=dumb. Why was "hit and run" not allowed on Alphabay? Relaunched Alphabay by Desnake is still alive today. What is the biggest darkweb marketplace today?


Anonymous 01/10/2024 (Wed) 10:15 [Preview] No.49428 del
>>49408
Muta made a video exposing dirty Jew rats. Based.
Investigating The New York Jewish Tunnel...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zxWUAO2iVo4 [Embed]


Anonymous 02/18/2024 (Sun) 22:22 [Preview] No.50075 del
Threads "over." Heres a video about a guy drinking acetone https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZxzUS1P4bnQ [Embed]


We can marry four 6yo girls and fuck four 9yo girls. Anonymous 02/19/2024 (Mon) 00:07 [Preview] No.50077 del
>Islamic sources of the classical era list Aisha's age at the time of her marriage as six or seven and nine or ten at its consummation.
<We can marry four 6yo girls and fuck four 9yo girls.



Top | Catalog | Post a reply | Magrathea | Return