>>60
I know you feel really clever right now but trying to argue with the king of the universe when he has a giant flaming torture chamber specifically for people like you is pretty silly.

>>61
I can’t tell if this is ironic or genuine

>>62
I'll put it into words you can understand. You're walking down the street when you're approached by a criminal holding a gun. He tells you that his bullets rupture a fabric in space-time and send you to a plane of infinite torment if he shoots you. He promises to let you walk free and even give you some delicious food as long as you acknowledge his power and apologize for some transgression against him. Do you
A) Do what he says
B) Try to be a smartass and risk suffering forever
Please answer seriously

>>63
Sorry, I can’t hear you with Jesus’ throbbing cock in your mouth

>>63
>you're approached by
except your silly god never does this, because he doesnt exist

Everything we observe in the universe operates through cause and effect. Every effect has a cause, and every effect can become the cause of another effect. Follow this chain backwards and eventually we reach the question: What caused reality itself? There are two possibilities.

1. Something caused reality.

If something caused reality, then there exists a causation whose effect is the creation reality itself. The ultimate causation responsible for the existence of everything is what we would call God.

2. Nothing caused reality.

Absolute nothing means no matter, no energy, no space, no time, no laws and no causation. If everything came from absolute nothing, then reality came into existence without causation and outside the natural rules governing reality. Something creating everything from nothing, outside the rule of causation, is supernatural. That is what we call God.

So either reality is the effect of an ultimate cause, or everything emerged from nothing through a supernatural event. Whichever option you pick is confirmation of the existence of God.