not everything is solid but still a lot of good connections

>>158

how do I come across one of those logins for

https://sentinelv2.scottishrite.org

>>976
It was https://secure1.scottishrite.org I remember before it changed to https://sentinelv2.scottishrite.org/Login.aspx I saw something like secure2.scottishrite.org
As far as getting in I remember someone fucking with the url to get some sort of new page. I would take the fact that they use internet explorer to guess that phishing would be the best bet. That or social engineering a temporary login because reading that page for a year or 2 most of the updates are in fact questions of how to login and receive a password. If I knew a way to do it I would have tried it this is not my expertise. However the https:secure1.scottishrite.org is the same page as https://sentinelv2.scottishrite.org/Login.aspx just updated. I am checking out the how2 pdf off of the page and that proves alone that it is what James Wright claims it is the database of all masons sorted by occupation.

But only 100 people (the supreme council) have access so I do not know how easy or harder it would make it to access.

>>1211
I would say that the Jews don't grasp Greek Metaphysics and had mixed it with other cults. Someone's been posting a lot in /pol/'s webm thread recently that shares some info as to what the kabbalah teaches. There's a brief introduction as to what Jewish mysticism is about on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_mysticism#Notes

I had studied philosophy and 99.9% of it is no better than religion. I know enough to categorize "Christianity" into four groups: Radical Christianity, Christianism, Christology, and Churchianity. Radical Christianity is true Christianity. Christianism (not the same as the Christianism mentioned in Wikipedia) is whatever Christians say that is true Christianity, are secondary to the primary sources so there's bound to be errors and lies from the devil. Christology is an academic/secular attempt to explain the other three but those that study Christology aren't necessarily Christians and so are bound to misinterpret the bible. Churchianity/Cultural Christianity/Christendom is all the junk stuff nobody cares about of which unfortunately many self proclaimed Christians are doomed to deal with because it also infects Christology and Christianism. Radical Christianity is purely outside of Churchianity.

I can tell you that most Christians don't understand the difference between the various Greek mystery schools. Paul basically said to the Colossians in chapter 2:8 "Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ." However, that isn't to say there isn't any "philosophy" of Christianity. The bible is full of such confusing examples. There's a form of Christian Rationalism that tries to explain stuff like the Trinity without making statements that contradict the bible. Modal trinity and Dynamic trinity concepts are considered heretical. https://youtube.com/watch?v=PSBgvWr7dcY [Embed] Also, the very crux of Radical Christianity rests upon the belief that there isn't a grand unified field theory and if there were, it will never be knowable. The nonheretodox/"orthodox" (not referring to the Orthodox Christian Churches) form of the Christian Trinity is the "proof" against all forms of vain philosophy of man (from the perspective of Christians). Pythagorean, Platonic, and Neoplatonic philosophy is Greek Monism and again, the Jews don't grasp it, Paul never spoken against them, but there's some similarities here and there between them, but ultimately they're grouped with "philosophy and vain deceit". The "biblical" form of the Christian Trinity is not explicitly described systematically in the bible, but rather described in bits and pieces here and there in the bible. Trying to form a systematic understanding of the bible for one self by themselves is a part of Radical Christianity. Relying on the words of other Christians as to what they claim to be what's in the bible is Christianism, especially if it's not justified in the primary source text. Relying on any external non Christian sources is Christology. Churchianity is part Christianism and Christology mixed with bullshit that gets you to pay up the most money in a false, unbiblical form of charity, reducing church service into a show in front of a live audience and superficiality. (cont)

>>1212
The Saducees didn't believe that there was a "soul", they believed in the no soul doctrine of which Aristotelian Atomists/Materialists also doesn't believe in. If you only read the Old Testament, the "breath of life" returns to God while their body returns to adamah/ground. Paul was the first to formulate the tripartite being concept of the body-mind-spirit tri-unity of man (AKA trichotomy of man) in the Christian bible but he was not the first to form a "Trinity". Some people suspect that he ripped it off of Plato just as (((Philo of Alexandria))) tried to incorporate Platonic thought into Rabbinic Misnhic Judaism but nobody knows for certain. The modern form of the Trinity is the one explained by St. Augustine which the Orthodox Churches despise him for his concept of the filioque. Anyways, the concept of the Trinity of the Godhead was in the Old Testament here and there as well as the New Testament, but to claim that there's a trichotomy of man to be derived from the Old Testament exclusively is a harder claim to make unless you think that a soul means the synthesis between the flesh and the spirit based off of Genesis 2:7. From the perspective of the Greek Monists, the Christians secularized Monistic Metaphysics while from the perspective of the Christians, Pythagoras and Plato might had read the first few chapters of the book of Genesis but didn't cared about whatever promises God made to "his people" and so doesn't care about Jesus Christ.

>>1213
Of course Jesus Christ didn't exist when Pythagoras and Plato was alive, but I meant that they didn't care about a savior archetypal that was prophesied in the Old Testament to be considered by any stretch of the imagination to be a prerequisite for "salvation" through the work and sacrifice of someone else. An external objective salvation didn't make sense to them in comparison to internal salvation through subjective enlightenment and union between your own spirit and the Nous and the Monad which the Nous and the Monad are coprinciples of each other just as one can't separate a mind behind a principle and a principle behind a mind. This concept is also known as the aoristos dyad, which doesn't exist in Christianity, neither does Henosis. The Greeks didn't believe that Theoria needed a mediator between them and the divine principle. The Orthodox Church's concept of Theoria is not biblical, they downplay the crucifixion of Jesus Christ dying for our sins to be something necessary and instead, unnecessary, yet all the while trying to gain salvation through their own external works of faith when salvation comes before faith itself.

>>1214
*theosis

Theoria is Theurgy, the synthesis of the Nous and one's own consciousness. Theosis is not Theurgy though at first glance is mistaken for it.

The Occult Philosophy by Michael A Hoffman -- full 1hr speech Anaheim 1987

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED LISTENING

>>1401
Hoffman is one of the most insightful modern authors on the subject, as well as exposing the nature of Talmudism and "Christian" Zionism.

>....the after-the-fact revelations are as much a part of the assassination plot as the murder and its initial cover-up. It's a deliberate psychological process they're taking us through, a psychodrama of enormous scale, though not really different from the principle behind the anonymous circulation of the Rosicrucian manifestos of the I7th century, with their mocking hints of identity.

>One: the ritual murders are successfully accomplished. The principals get-away, the scapegoat conveniently takes the blame. Two: later we learn the truth but no one is prosecuted. We are mocked, disoriented and demoralized. Occult prestige and potency is heightened.

>This is what simplistic researchers miss: the function of macabre arrogance thumbing its nose at us while we do nothing except spread the tale of their immunity and invincibility further. That is the game plan operant here.

- Michael A. Hoffman II Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare Page 88-89

Conspiracy of Silence, pedo sex ring exposure documentary (1994)

My browser crashes when trying to upload the 129mb webm of this so I'll just drop the youtube link instead

https://youtube.com/watch?v=vBSIDQt5Dwc [Embed]

>>1415
good video, thanks for making these

Is there anyone can help reupload these webms?

>>1773
I have a few of those but right now endchan will display them as null files even if reuploaded. They need to either be changed or dead files need to be deleted from endchan so they can be reuploaded properly.

>>1775
I might delete this thread because I put almost all of it in https://dbr.ee/p8Kx and that I can upload in a new thread along with the documentaries. I still have some of them encoded to webm.

>>1776
Just because you delete the thread doesn't mean the broken files are gone from the server.

>>1778
I wanna cut that down to around 30 minutes.

Deleted the broken webm link posts and checked the scrub option hopefully it will allow them to be posted again. If not then just convert them to mp4,

>>1779
Having watched it the whole way through it actually does convey a masonic conspiracy so I will focus on making more content and maybe making a short version with redpill parts and no filler as a "previously on webms" montage. But I hated it all in one video for the first day or 2 figuring it would be saturated with the worst of it which is going off into memes. It fits better than I thought it did skipping around the video

but now is not the time to feel good I need to make more we all need to make more oc get retards to ask more questions about their worldview in threads offsite to redpill.

or else they are gonna try and take down the world with the guillotines depopulation. I dont want to do this I have to. I should start mirroring anywhere I can and want to hear what people felt convinced by because I want to help make something as an argument against the cult that can not be debunked.

>>1782
Well That must mean i have to re-encode it because of the broken link mess. here we go

>>2367
>>2371
>>2183
hi-fi/normal version.

>>2561
Longer 720p version (with some stuff about Michael Rood's ministry of which I don't support that conman) https://youtube.com/watch?v=QEm-ovpMM5c [Embed]

Another good explanation by David Rohl but this time about Edin of Ararat using multiple sources including the Epic of Gilgamesh and the account of Sargon II along with some history of the development of Babylonian archaeology: https://youtube.com/watch?v=jjuYYFn1cXk [Embed]

Watch these too

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ngeInJekiIA [Embed]
https://youtube.com/watch?v=xBw9jC8SvLw [Embed]

There's more to life than physics.

Here are some comments that were down-voted by the Hacker News community regarding "Dark Matter" ...

Title: The Reason We Haven’t Directly Detected Dark Matter (medium.com)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18207276
>[mixmastamyk 1 hour ago] Believe the issue people have with “dark matter” is really about the term, it points to a so-far unprovable solution as a goal rather than a problem. It elevates a hypothesis to already solved, just need evidence. If they called it the “galactic paradox” it would be more easily recognized as a problem to work on. You can downvote but it only proves the perception problem, not wanting to hear it doesn’t help.
>[lottin 5 hours ago] So, basically physicists have deduced two facts, and these facts don't agree with one another. From this they conclude that there must be something else in the universe, something unseen and undetectable, that they call dark matter. But what about the other possibility, which seems far more reasonable to me, that either one of the facts is wrong?
>[std_throwawayay 5 hours ago] If we can't detect it or disprove it, it doesn't even belong to science. It belongs to the same realm as witches and demons - until some smart physicist devises a way to actually detect it.
>[roenxi 5 hours ago] Our understanding of gravity might be completely wrong. If 85% of the gravity is unexplainable that seems like a pretty safe bet. Maybe it just behaves very differently at galactic scale. Much like the aether, it seemed most likely that light traveled through a medium until it turned out that it probably doesn't.
>[skdjii 5 hours ago] Another reason may be that dark matter doesn't exist. If the universe consists of 85% of the stuff it would seem that it should be easy to find. Occams razor should apply as usual.
>[user812 6 hours ago]Indeed. Physics is wrong on many fundamental levels, but everytime physicists find fundamental errors, they propose another entirely theoretical layer of complexity, with the "benfit" that no one is able to practically refute it.
>[tychomaz 6 hours ago] Because it doesn’t exist. Dark matter is a fudge factor to prop-up a theory that astrophysics is too afraid to put to rest.

>>2781
There's something that I call "popular science" and "celebrity scientists." I'm sure you've seen those trashy science TV shows or magazines that just repeat the same basic facts in a sensationalist manner to make the watchers feel like they're smart. Celebrity scientists do the exact same thing, and they often appear on those shows. Neil deGrasse Tyson, Stephen Hawking, that asian guy, Bill Nye... they are entertainers before scientists. Basically people with no real knowledge of science watch these shows and then whenever someone tries to disagree with something on them they all come out of the woodworks and go "i saw it on tv so it must be true." As a result many scientific theories becomes a sort of religion with "true believers" that don't actually understand the theory, but will defend it to death. Dark matter, dark energy, and string theory are perfect examples of this. They get shilled all over the place, so normies believe it.

>>2781
All those people are ignorant of the necessity of the aether, no experiment ever disproved it, while on the contrary there's proof for the ether. The "Hacker News" community always was a bunch of atomistic idiots and the only "smart" people on there are those that only know that they don't know, all else are those that keep on expressing their ignorance that they're ignorant without providing any proper metaphysical (many of you don't even know the proper understanding of metaphysics) explanation as to what's really happening. It's these types of people that don't have "free will" since they're always stuck in some false paradigm and can't fully escape it.

>>2782
>>2784
The reason I browse mainstream sites like Hacker News is to get a sense of how mainstream people think about stuff, I only come there to skim through the comment sections ...

Anyway Neil deGrasse Tyson, Michio Kaku (that asian guy), Bill Nye all appeared on the Coast To Coast AM show (which features many controlled opposition figures readily found on the Internet and Mainstream Media)
I never liked them, not before knowledge of controlled opposition and after it, they didn't feel genuine to me. Then again I had an aversion towards everything mainstream.

https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=BjluH0eNt5Y
Another good David Rohl lecture, this one's fairly new

>>2907
The first video is mostly unsubstantiated speculation about CERN bullshit though it is interesting that the CBS broadcasting center has a old brewery cellar that they're implying that it's where they bury people when there's no proof of that whatsoever. There is room for speculation that certain ritual shit could had happened down there under CBS's hands but no evidence was provided in the video.

>>2814
Necronomicon ≠ Necronomicon Ex Mortis

Michael Tsarion

The Pedophocracy by David McGowan
https://youtube.com/watch?v=E25nV0B6rp4 [Embed]

>>3215
disregard this one, video does not match the title. My bad.

>>3215
Its still relevent thanks

>>3215
wait wtf how does he look like a young kid

>>3306
Who Michael Aquino in the thumbnail of that video? That was from "Exposing satans underground" https://youtube.com/watch?v=EcWbuBPNtPw [Embed] an expose by geraldo rivera in the early 1990's. Aquino and Ted Gunderson debate for a bit in that episode. I just started listening to that video your replying to and she makes a lot of good points.

>>434
>that first webm
>"but they're not Zionists, in fact most of their leaders are Gaelic"
thanks anon, shit like this continues to blow my mind

>>4301
Late reply but whatever, someone might read it and get the wrong idea too. It's not even about the Scots (from Scotia, egyptian princess, also consider Scottish Rite of Freemasonry) or the Irish (Tuatha de Danan, tribe of Dan?) as much as it is about the lineage that's characterized by red and blonde hair. Not every redhead is a part of this but when you read that Mohammad had red hair as did Barbarossa (literrally Redbeard) gears should start turning in your head. If I remember correctly king David was described as a ginger too but I'm not sure how to process that information. Anyway, as it turns out, in most myths or accounts that tell about giants they have blonde or red hair (and are often said to come from somewhere underground, Hitler was very interested in that underground - Agartha). An easy example would be those Eastern Island heads were unearthed and actually are full sculptures of giants with what looks like red hats but was intended to be the hair.

>>4570
here's one more connection