the haven't been so in my experience. of a process trying to stereotype skeptic types, I remain skeptical.

>explain something to a skeptic
>they go hmmm in a condescending way

>>4103
These aren't skeptics. Skeptics are the opposite of these people. A skeptic would take what he sees on mainstream media with a grain of salt and research on his own time if interested.
This is a consoomer with a DVR machine filled with Daily Show episodes.

>>4116
i was thinking of a different kind of person. that is a skeptic but its also an npc. what i was imagining is the demographic of people who at least outwardly obey the masonic deception. to the point if you say something that explains the deception they go hmmmm while imagining their throat being slit if they agree.

Hey, just so you know I've been scrubbing some of the broken images so that they may be re-posted.
Some of the old images have been broken since the backend migration, so even if they get re-posted they still won't quite work.
If you see any you can report them globally and we'll scrub them so then they'll work.

>>4118
thanks i have the backups so its easier to just modify and repost. might do that though i have run into that a few times.

>>4103
>>4116
Anon is right, OP. I can see that you meant skeptics of the truth, though.

Seems to me that they either are literal NPCs (research inner-monologue studies if you haven't) or are simply lying to keep the happy delusion up. That, or they are willing servants of the system, in any case still obnoxious.