/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

shitpost your way to the left

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Board Rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Magrathea | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


(1.81 MB 3990x2245 1446363001103.jpg)
What seperates left wingers from right wingers? /leftypol/etariot 01/08/2016 (Fri) 08:35:11 Id: 20d22a [Preview] No. 137
This is a re-post of one of my threads on 8chan /leftypol/ but since this board needs some fresh content I thought I'd post it here as well.

The answer is social Darwinism.

That's why the libertarians and Nazis on /pol/ generally get along just fine.

Libertarians would gladly have the "free market" economically purge undesirables, where as Nazis would just do it through the power of their military state.

Leftists believe in equality which is opposed to the idea of social Darwinism.

Ironically, most right wingers don't believe in evolution even though they advocate social Darwinist ideas whereas most left wingers believe in evolution although they don't believe that different classes of people should be discriminated against based on their place in the social hierarchy.

One could even theoretically argue that mutualists don't have a problem with Darwinism as long as it's collective Darwinism instead of individualistic "survival of the fittest".


/leftypol/etariot 01/09/2016 (Sat) 02:20:41 Id: 4cd0c9 [Preview] No. 143 del
>>137
>That's why the libertarians and Nazis on /pol/ generally get along just fine.

As a /pol/ack (I normally only lurk, I'm not shitting up post content), Naziboos do not get along with libertarians. It's pretty well agreed upon, of those over there, that libertarianism in its modern interpretation leads to leftist anarchy.

>Ironically, most right wingers don't believe in evolution

Source? Imo that's mostly a Ken Ham thing, not for normal conservatives.

>although they don't believe that different classes of people should be discriminated against based on their place in the social hierarchy.

Rattle off muh no true scotsman all you want or whatever variation of that there is (i.e. "that's Stalinism, I believe in true Trotskyism"), there's quite a bit of evidence to prove that isn't quite the case. It's just, well, the reverse of traditional neo-con'ism. Rather than the poor who get discriminated against, it's the ex-bourgeoisie/educated, who get discriminated against. Stalin gulag'd loads of scientists and productive farmers in order to enforce the 'freedom' of his proletariat proponents.



Top | Catalog | Post a reply | Magrathea | Return