board is slow but I want an IB to discuss ancap, ;_;

you stupid niggers aren't dying on me, let the snek roam free

Americans scream toothpicks will never be outlawed because the price of building more prisons is too expensive, but did the costs of jails stop lawmakers from banning straws?

>>32
This is disgusting, even if he was properly informed and signed consent to such treatment. Which may be not an option, like lying in coma after car accident.

One of the problems with tyranny is that it increases.

Americans born today think torture, kill lists, groping, and wiretapping are perfectly acceptable.

There was a time when you didn't need a driver license. Later driver licenses were required. Driver licenses then needed a photo. Later you needed a written exam. A driving test was then required. Later you needed a medical test. A car inspection was required. Later you needed liability insurance. Driver license fees increased and fingerprints were required. Soon DNA samples, microchip implants, and vaccines will be needed to get a license.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=EotHcLHsAXs [Embed]
somebody explain why this wouldn't work

The boxcars won't even be needed because Americans are so enslaved now that Americans will drive themselves to the concentration camps.

http://f2bbs.com/bbs

In a free country, you are the one who is responsible if your life is a mess.

In a police state, you can blame the government if your life has been destroyed.

I wonder why anarchist terminology is such a mess

No one cares about the big picture.

Americans used to be outraged about Bruce Jenner, Greta Thunberg, Kavanaugh, Rittenhouse, statues, Epstein, Smollett, and George Floyd.

Now Americans have lost their minds about Biden, but no one cares that the US is a bankrupt warmongering police state.

it's not

>>25
Okay, it's a bit different with local warlords (maybe I'm missing something here but I honestly can't imagine it turning out any other way) but problem of already existing imperialistic powers remains.

Lets say u made an ancap country. Yes, the borders would be open and any1 could technically come inside and destroy everything. But lets say there's a big company in ur ancap country that constantly makes deals with the US. That company helps USA's economy, do u rly think they would attack ur ancap country when its existence helps the US? (I keep using USA as an example but rly it could be with any country).

>>27
Economic relationships didn't stop WW1. I mean it's always a good idea to have another layer of protection in form of financial losses on part of the assailant but if it's the only card they have that ancap territory (can ancaps even form countries?) could simply get subjugated in one way or another and provide the service at terms primarily beneficial to the stronger partner, most likely having to surrender some freedoms as well.
There isn't exactly much land that doesn't have some state's claim on it. Getting an entire existing state to go full anarchy is a tad unrealistic. You can convince a local population but seceding will, even if done peacefully, destabilize the area and is going to hard to legitimize. Not that nothing even remotely similar was ever achieved eg. Switzerland but there's enough to suggest they had Templar military and monetary support and those were simpler times.

The very same Americans who scream that they hate the police state then turn around and support the police.

WTF?