WMD's, specifically nukes achieved that already. No link necessary, thanks.

>>78616
THIS!

Once countries like Iran & Ukraine get nukes pariah superpowers will leave them alone. It's been proven already, no nation that wants to survive directly goes to war with a nuclear superpower, Mutually Assured Destruction ensures that EVERYONE would lose another world war so it is not even worth entertaining such a crazy idea. The more nukes, the better.

>>78615
Go ahead, share the link. I'd be interested to see if it makes any sense or not.

>>78616
i dont think world peace is ever 100% possible, but nukes are the closest we ever have, and probably will, get.
but get a dumb fucking psycho in government, in any country that has nukes, and that will be a huge risk to world peace.
but after the nuclear apocalypse, if it ever happens, does front its head our the sand. well just go back to tribalistic wars for innovation and nothing changes.

>>78615
pls share the link anon.

>>78620
>>78623

Thanks for the interest. Here is the link to the proposal:
https://www.change.org/GlobalGovernmentNow

I understand the realist view on nuclear deterrence, but this project aims for a more structural approach to prevent any "dumb fucking psycho" from pulling the trigger. Check it out and let me know your thoughts.

>>78637
BRICS+ already has the solution my friend. Respect national sovereignty, global free trade, protect and respect differing cultures, promote free market and free enterprise, work towards world peace with respect and acceptance to national borders and differing cultures.

I do not trust big tech oligarchs or globohomo corrupt western governments anymore. All they have provided us is endless wars, a massive surveillance state and national debt insolvency. I'm fucking DONE with this shitty unfair hostile system we have today.

BRICS is the future, or there is no future and I could care less if the nukes are used if it has to come to that.