>>41
Post leftism is a critique of and moving away from leftism. In most aspects we believe leftists don't go far enough with their goals. Where they seek to end hierarchy in work and reform civil society, we want to abolish work and destroy civilization.

Basically maximum edginess

>>42
Also we tend to dislike the moralism, collectivism, and identity politics of the left

What are your opinions on individually focused characters seeing theism as a bureaucratic category, and therefore projecting an inherently authoritarian view on religion that's ultimately dogmatic (by what I mean here, that is unquestionable canon within their worldview)?

Surely, an authoritarian needs not be registered as such to be a true specimen of his kind, nor does plebeian, and none of the faustian literature. Yet in accordance to this dogma, the a-theistic aggregate would hold and preserve a legal category of "christian" along with any other such denomination not only to thought police others, but to uphold the identity for themselves to latch onto.

>>45
Mysticism or spiritualism or whatever is cool with me.

But anyways, most people have a religious view that makes them subservient to some higher power. I think that's a "bad" attitude, so for this reason I call religion authoritarian. Even if there were no priests or witch-hunters or actual people to spread or enforce religion, it would be shit. Because even if you take away the physical aspect of its oppressive nature, you are left with the part that is mental subjugation.

>>49
>even if you take away the physical aspect of its oppressive nature, you are left with the part that is mental subjugation.

So is personal identity, because the idea of person is installed to you through either society or God, and this mental subjugation follows you regardless of its source as you enforce your taken identity, rendering your concept of authority that can be specified to religion or anything for that matter inherently absurd.

>>42
>abolish work and destroy civilization

How would you guys prevent the civilization from rising again naturally? That being said, how do you define civilization?

>>42
>Basically maximum edginess
KEK

>>42
I might hang out here

So you guys are Stirnerites?

>>109
Yeah most of us are egoists in some way

>>110
Apart from Stirner who should I read? Is the Anarchist Library worth torrenting?

>>111
I'd start with Bob Black. The anarchist library is definitely a great resource.

>>53
>gives example of religion creating a subjugated individual
>this is why religion isn't "bad"

wut

Would religion be a key component to society? If it creates a subjugated individual, then it is society in a more spiritual form.
>maximum edginess
that's poetry

>>111
thread here on post leftist reading: http://8ch.net/freedu/res/1288.html