>>111
I'd start with Bob Black. The anarchist library is definitely a great resource.

>>53
>gives example of religion creating a subjugated individual
>this is why religion isn't "bad"

wut

Would religion be a key component to society? If it creates a subjugated individual, then it is society in a more spiritual form.
>maximum edginess
that's poetry

>>111
thread here on post leftist reading: http://8ch.net/freedu/res/1288.html

it's like in pokemon when you've collected all the pokemon but in this case it's STDs

I made a lot of spelling and grammatical errors in my post, I hope that doesn't make it too hard to understand what I had to say on the subject. It's nearly 3 am here and I just compulsively wrote this up on the spot.

Don't worry about spelling and grammar that much. Read linguistics.

>>152
The main people who ran it all stopped being post leftists. It's dead.

thejohnprice/whats-the-point-of-star-trek-discovery-6496c35e1ab6">https://medium.comthejohnprice/whats-the-point-of-star-trek-discovery-6496c35e1ab6
But what if post leftism is the future

noice

no

Set a fire to my spire and I might when I retire.

If you masturbate to 2d anime titty, you are sinning.
Anime porn is the work of the devil

>>125
This was a joke about the masturbatory implications of repurposing a place of communion as an effigy. I thought I was hilarious.

He's making fun of Hegel. Read Landstreicher you nerd

So the post-left just hand waves it off as "j-just a joke!". This is pathetic.

How about you just accept that this author isn't infallible and not worth purging all of anarchist theory to center it on? The post-left situation within the anarchist movement is the biggest fucking joke I can think of. A milleu in the bourgiest parts of the primary world-power, the source of anarcho-primitivism, anarcho-pedoism, police informants as chief theorists and the list goes on. If this isn't what intelligence agencies sabotage of anarchist theory would look like I don't know what would. And then of course you have, at the same time, western academia trying to do the same thing, but from within the theory of "post-anarchism", which again removes all anarchist theorists as "not pure enough lol" to re-center anarchism around Stirner's asshole and a bunch of PoMo pseudo-Marxists.

And don't get me wrong, I appreciate Stirner's insurrectionary and union-of-egoist conceptions, McQuinn (post-left) seems genuine, May (post-anarchism) too, but from a generalized perspective, with aspects like OP is pointing out, it's hard not to get the impression that what is happening is a shift away from 'anarcho-leftism' and toward anarcho-fascism. Abandonment of internationalism, emphasis on might makes right (which allows Hakim Bey to think of himself of an "anarchist" and not a pedophile rapist), ideological racism (OP); a topic previously only touched upon in passing (Proudhoun, Bakunin), not fucking ingrained dialectically within their fucking works. B-but it was juss a joke, anon! Well too bad it was so non-obvious that neo-fascists like Evola couldn't tell the difference and used Stirner for refreshing fascist theory.

>>145
Your concern sounds awfully contemporary. How about you learn to deal with people being fallible, and others might be more proactive in letting your highness know they already accept it.

>>147
How2reply w/o addrez argumentz xd