>>93991This is maybe the only really useful thread in this whole board. A shame it took so much to get this up.
That said, there are few things which should be clarified:
1) Is this thread only for finalized plans, or also for discussing the plans into more detail or about the general setup of said plans?
2) What can be done about the jews lurking here, who will use this thread as a warning sample to test their next poisoning attacks and to prepare counter plans against any plan even remotely suggested here?
As in, is it really wise to discuss plans in the open if the tactic used is one of surprise attack?
About the matter of discussing plans in the open, I've a suggestion about how to proceed on that, any plan discussed openly should be devised to be effective even if it's known by the enemy, maybe even the main trait or quality of open plans should be precisely that immunity to counters, the core of the plan comes second.
The effectiveness of a plan when it's known by the enemy, as far as I know, can run over 3 schemes or models:
1) the enemy is unable to do anything about the plan even if they know about it, as in the plan is out of reach for the enemy
2) the enemy knowing about the plan is going to further play into the plan effectiveness, as in, the counter-reaction to the plan should be incorporated into the plan itself to have a reiforcing effect for the plan. The aim is for the plan to grow stronger the more the enemy knows about it.
3) play the enemy over a dilemma, if they react to he plan the plan gains more power, if they don't react to it the plan continues its course. Meaning the plan will have become immune to the reactions of the enemy because the enemy is now scared to react to it fearing they may worsen their position if the do react to it
In most cases a plan devised to be resistant to the enemy reactions, and so the only plans worth discussiong openly, such plans must often be compopsed of two or more parts.
An active part, the "punch which hurts" of the plan.
A counter-reactive part, giving all the plan and all its parts resistance to counter-plans by the enemy. The "agility" or "spiked coat" of the plan.
To have a plan to be immune or reactive to the enemy knowing it, it's also important to know the enemy, to have the best reaction or difficulty for the enemy to counter it.
On that side, it's important to know that the jews have been using for some centuries now that tactic of "fabianism", as it's evident in the fabian society activities, that is the tactic of slow and indirect erosion of the opposition while avoiding any direct confrontation.
Knowing this can be a guide to better devide effective plans:
1) the jews fear direct confrontations, because anything they stand on is based on lies and fraud, meaning any plan must also include a direct attack, and that direct attack must be devised to be highly perforative against the jewish "defences" and with high success chances to connect with the target
2) the jews currently have hold of the majority of the tools usually used for indirect attacks, that is the mass medias and any form of communication tool. Same goes for the other tipical tools of indirect attacks, that is sabotaging, infiltration, spreading confusion, basically the usualy glownigger actions, which are also mainly controlled by jews. This should suggest that playing their same game of indirect attack and of slow erosion has low chances to be effective, because by sheer volume the jews are in advantage on that front, unless something new and more effective is devised to overplay that jews on their own home field.
That said, even if the jews are the ones playing the erosion game, they have grown up over time to be so encroached on their own stolen power and wealth that now the erosion tactic is very effective against them too.
(see the last 4 images of
>>94228 as good examples of reactive plans as explained in this second post)