>>28
Just because it isn't immoral doesn't mean we support it

support is a benevolent action and therefore moral therefore moralism

Pedophilia has personally effected my ability to express my personal political theory of libre.I hate and do not support advocate or allow pedophilia. Pedophila is not libre. Unfortunatly people have abused this notion of freedom and made a chan to post kids and since then libre has been tainted by theses people. Now I know their abomination chan was shut down but that means people search out the word libre and see chan in the url and see my libre treatises on reddit tumbler and 8chan and they think it has to do with some hive of sexual predators. They think freedom means avoiding capture under the appreciation of freedom. They abuse freeedom they ARE NOT LIBRE The notion of freedom has been trampled on. I try to portray how the modern human is in a state of libre and then I say how humans shall not be shackled by restrictions. Every single time I try and express libre they think of librechan and the word libre itself has become a pizza code word of sorts. Why not I change the name? Because I am not going to be shackled by this though to be honest it has made it a problem I do not want to make a board called /libre/ because I dont want to wake up to naked kids on my answer to fixing society. An open sourced inclusive world community with the top layer of those without fear. This of course is a consortium of maniacs and is like the ripely's believe it or not meets life size statues like the silver surfer the true elite. You do not disrespect le libre with your petty groping of children. That is like taking a cage and calling it libre these swine that fondle. These swine that fondle are not libre. I am appalled.

>>35
They also took the fist which was librechans logo. so the pedophile stole the word libre and the fist. I almost had to leave the country they are framing leftists with this pedo shit.

>>35
> They abuse freeedom they ARE NOT LIBRE

Apparently there is some history and different terminology at play here, but as I see it, you only accept a mutual freedom as freedom? Like, your reasons for why people acting freely isn't 'libre' is because others are not free?

I don't really accept any bit of this. If we force the (((bad))) people to abide by rules (i.e. to be domesticated, to be submissive and dominated internally by a plethora of geists, etc.), this opens the door for all sorts of oppression on anyone. And not even just this weak slippery slope argument, but honestly I worry about being among the first on the cutting block. Because who else is universally hated? The anti-social people, the maniacs, the amoral ones, and so on. So fuck your "libre". I want freedom.

>>36
> I almost had to leave the country they are framing leftists with this pedo shit.

Then maybe stop being a leftist...