>>115890late night game theory (don't mind the mistakes kek)
how many players in this game (that is not a game)?
keep simple = Rs, dem leaders, swamp (hidden player)
Anons fall into Rs for this example
all dem leaders = swamp
otherwise some dem leaders would NOT have voted for 1.7 trillion
Rs swamp: 18 also voted for 1.7 trillion
so it looks like we have _ Rs and 212 dem leaders; what if we count the 18 RINOs as swamp?
212 dem leaders + 18 RINOs = visible obvious swamp [230]
need 218; how can speaker Trump ever get the 18 RINOs?
however we play it [they] have a way out
mccarthy has his 200 Rs and all the dem leaders if mccarthy is swamp; thas why the odds are stacked against us
we have a long shot, great odds against; drawing to an inside straight
but if we catch, we can break swamp
optics > optical illusion/narative
>'ammo is expensive' (figuratively)[they] will say Rs are disorganized and desperate etc
that is the optics [they] will cast
[they] do it for the power of the People
if (You) want the power of the People what should be cast instead or counter to?
>what is the counter?if you can turn the 20 heroic then moar will join
fake news will say Rs are looking stupid, holding things up, causing chaos, etc
Rs (Anons) will have to grow the 20 by countering fake news perfectly
those 20 need to hold out and hold out while Rs(Anons) go to work and show why the 20 are right and why moar should join the 20
>a fight for optics control? >Boebert is correct because..>Gaetz is correct because..if we are winning, moar will join and the People will grow louder because our msg will be to ask the People to grow louder if they DON'T want mccarthy
pass the msg and tell others to pass the msg: 'grow louder if you don't want mccarthy'
as the People become louder it makes it easier for those leaders in those states to go against mccarthy publicly
growing that 20 will send a shiver up swamp's spine like xerxes kek
imo
>work together>usually fold weak hands, but it seems ppl want to fight swamp so why not try some counters kek