because they lie to the common man and call it being true to their brothers.

continuously attempt to demoralize me through every method imaginable.ruining multiple prospects of relationships. ruining my life in general. i turn on a podcast its a mason talking shit. I go on any of the boards i frequent its masons talking shit. its a disgusting cult of mean people who obsess over literal nobodies because they have gigantic underground areas even in places where you would think that is impossible geographically. Go back to the holes you crawled out of you fucking monsters.

>>4148
they are also trying to get me to commit suicide. Every single day of my life they tell me to shoot myself in the head.

>>4149
through vague threats and intimidation.

>>4150
and then they act stupid when and if you call them out on it. to the point i can't trust barely anyone in the fucking world. and then they make fun of you on top of that. which is fine im an idiot but they pretend its just making fun and tell you to lighten up.people who are treated opposite for being female saying to calm down as these fake ass people go ooh and aah at the shit they do to upset me. every day. then they even make fun of you for crying. and tell you to commit suicide. because they wear a faggot apron and rape america out of everything good. They have raped this nation. they are trying to steal an election with joe biden shutting everything down over a stupid virus they released.

>>2070
However you in between initiations or level increases you are approached by the truther faction to record a violent ritual and much like the initial goal of fighting both the faction and the cult to record and upload a human sacrifice video.


You also could make a sim city or a civilization kind of game where you use the secret socities to control the masses. The goal of the game is to kill all non initiates and dominate the entire map. The only challenge is to get the people to kill themselves by having crime guilds do false flags and you have to have enough media power to be able to do false flags. There is not tanks or weapons just toggleable policemen to "arrest people". Also wait you can have an adrenechrome part of the game where you farm children and cull people into cages like sim farm.

>>2070
>blowhorns
airhorns*

>>2069
>>2070
>>2071
>>2072
This is really interesting, thank you very much. Would you include any public figures other than dan schnider?

>>2083
It was a dan Schneider carechture. Not neccisarily Dan himself. So you could have a high witch be called Mrs. Clifton instead of hillary clinton. The game is contriversial enough you can't include public figures you would have to make people who are modeled after them.

the Epstein island game has dan's bait shack in it. If this is the same anon that made that game kudos. Very good so far. Love the puppet show thing. and the black mermaid in the beginning

Apparently there were some users in this ghost town, so here we go:

Endchan's Towel Day Special!
25th May, 20:00 UTC
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (2005)
- Howard the Duck (1986)

Link: https://cytu.be/r/endcorner
Discussion thread: >>>/operate/10923

We're gonna make spooky noises to fit the theme.

Is the Schweppes logo a Masonic pyramid? I'm asking because I'm not familiar with the symbols like some of the people here.

bump

News outlets have been a little too eager to claim 33 casualties despite the precise noumber being unknown.
The story sounds suspicious. This isn't such a high building. Jumping out and breaking bones is preferable to burning alive.
If it's going to follow into internet censorship it's pretty much given it's the same shit as with shootings and gun control.

>>3465
I think it is definatly an inside job/false flag. I don't think japan has to do censorship they just adjust the npc levels in the water and people self censor. Lol jk. But its probably not a vie for censorship as much as it is the elite toying with the public and usign this as human sacrifice in the form of a false flag. Im not sure what anime studio it was i remember this it was around last week. Very strange you see this kind of thing often the 33 trapped chilean miners stuck in a mine. They love that number.

>>3612
It could be that it was a deception and not the actual ancestor. Being beamed from saturn to mess with the redhead.

>>3585
Then in this case, Paul wouldn't have qualified for "apostleship" in the sense that the other 12 apostles were, but was an "apostle" in again his own certain criteria.
Hence why he was called the "apostle of the gentiles".
>It doesn't say that at all, in fact. It doesn't even mention he was there at all.
<The Lord grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day: and in how many things he ministered unto me at Ephesus, thou knowest very well
It does.
>I think have differing interpretations of this entire passage. My way of seeing it is that Paul called the law a curse and that you can be saved just with faith and works are an extra benefit. That is wrong. This is why I brought up James 2:20
And here, I answered it as I did in the Judaiser general. Anti-Law Pauline Christians and pro-Law anti-Pauline Christians (like you) go with the Law as a curse, but in reality it isn't a curse.
Basically, FAITH is what saves you, while works go along with faith. Many Pauline Christians themselves still don't understand this.
>How do we know he is telling the truth. If it is only Pauls statements I believe they are untrustworthy
Since it's a revelation, of course the only men that know about it are Paul and Jesus.
As for Paul's legitimacy, just compare him to the other Christian "teachers" mentioned in Acts (written by Luke) and the early church's historical records. Simon Magus, Nicholas (founder of the Nicolaitans) etc., all were rejected and rebuked yet Paul stayed.

>>3586
>It does
Ok maybe in english but in the original greek it is written differently.
2 Timothy 1:18
"may grant to him the lord to find mercy from the lord in that day, and for as much as in Ephesus he served better. You know it."
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/apostolic/2_timothy/1.htm
That's the link you used correct? either way this is slightly different as it states that onesiphorus was preaching in Ephesus and Paul himself wasn't there. The only person who claimed to be an apostle and preached in ephesus that we know of in scripture is Paul.

Also I know this is sort of unrelated. But have you noticed the similarites of Saul from the old testament and Saul from the new testament.
>Both were against a decendant of David. Jesus and well David himself
>Both were from the tribe of Benjamin
>Both were named Saul.
>Saul was replaced by David as king and Paul tried to be an apostle.
Just a little nod.

Also why did James question Paul about trying to get rid of the mosaic law. Wny would James have the need to question Paul if he never preached against the law
Acts 18-24

>>3587
>That's the link you used correct? either way this is slightly different as it states that onesiphorus was preaching in Ephesus and Paul himself wasn't there. The only person who claimed to be an apostle and preached in ephesus that we know of in scripture is Paul.
Perhaps, but Jesus in Revelation talks of multiple false apostles in Ephesus. Paul is just a single apostle on the other hand.
>Also I know this is sort of unrelated. But have you noticed the similarites of Saul from the old testament and Saul from the new testament.
Why do you think he was named Saul? Because he was from the tribe of Benjamin.
>Also why did James question Paul about trying to get rid of the mosaic law. Wny would James have the need to question Paul if he never preached against the law
James questioned Paul because Paul said that circumcision wasn't necessary for gentiles under the New Covenant. Even Peter came into conflict with Paul about this, and Paul writes about it in Galatians, incident at Antioch. Of course however this doesn't abrogate circumcision as a whole (he circumcised Timothy)
>"Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech: 13And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished: 14But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ. 15But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart. 16Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away."
Again, same thing with Galatians. He isn't saying the Law is abolished, just that Christ atones for the sins/transgressions of the Law that we all inherently have. Not til heaven and earth pass shall one jot pass from the law.
>Well the first thing we see him do is support the stoning of stephan. Not exactly a stunning representation of christian morale. However that was before his conversion and we saw earlier that James questioned Paul.
Also the apostles questioned Paul when he first came to them. But it isn't the same as Simon Magus (a Samaritan convert who taught sorcery and wealth) or Nicholas (whose followers, the Nicolaitans are hated by Jesus himself as said in Revelation). Not much questioning going on with Paul, and he was accepted.
>also I see you don't do that Yeshua/Yahshua thing. I think that is stupid myself tbh
It's common among Hebrew Roots movements, but I don't just to keep to standards, since Jesus's name was always transliterated in foreign languages. He even spoke Latin to Pontius Pilate.
It isn't wrong though that the root word for Jesus is technically Joshua. I've heard a man, a Gnostic claim that Jesus is actually the Greek word for healer, or related to Jason. This is nonsensical since "Jesus" in the Septuagint is actually used to refer to Joshua the man who conquered Canaan.

>>3588
>But Jesus in Revelation talks of multiple false apostles in Ephesus. Paul is just a single apostle on the other hand.
This doesn't mean that Paul isn't being talked about in revelation. That is like me doing this their are multiple false doctrines in christendom. Catholicism is just a single doctrine on the other hand. That doesn't suddenly make Catholicism not a false doctrine that's ridiculous.
>Why do you think he was named saul?
I'm pretty sure the tribe of Benjamin had more names than "Saul"

>Again same things with galatians
How do you explain "for unto this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done awau in Christ. That is literally smacking your head with a bible saying that moses laws were abolished when Jesus said contrary. You're doing mental gymnastics.

>James questioned Paul because Paul said that circumcision wasn't necessary for gentiles under the New Covenant. Even Peter came into conflict with Paul about this, and Paul writes about it in Galatians, incident at Antioch. Of course however this doesn't abrogate circumcision as a whole (he circumcised Timothy)
Actually funny thing with this. In acts 15 that was talking about circumcision. Peter and James were actually for restricting circumcision. They also say you are saved by grace in christ. However Paul states the opposite numerous times. This led to James confronting him about it in acts 21. Not to mention in acts 15 the attitude towards Paul was different. They were actually rather positive with him. It's only after he begins his ministry that they begin to question him.

Jesus actually mean's God's salvation. Joshua means God is my salvation.

>>3589
>This doesn't mean that Paul isn't being talked about in revelation. That is like me doing this their are multiple false doctrines in christendom. Catholicism is just a single doctrine on the other hand. That doesn't suddenly make Catholicism not a false doctrine that's ridiculous.
Perhaps, but you can't say for certain it's talking about Paul, since it actually refers to multiple such false apostles. Perhaps Paul was the exception.
>I'm pretty sure the tribe of Benjamin had more names than "Saul"
Of course, but Benjaminites would've prided Saul as a name as it was used for a king of their tribe.
>for unto this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done awau in Christ
Again, the Law is a way God instructed us to live. To avoid sin. Jesus's atonement pays for our sins. This is what Paul is talking about, not that the Law of Moses was abolished.
>mental gymnastics
Justifying the consistency of Romans 7:12 isn't mental gymnastics.
>Actually funny thing with this. In acts 15 that was talking about circumcision. Peter and James were actually for restricting circumcision. They also say you are saved by grace in christ.
Acts 15 was most likely after the Incident at Antioch (otherwise the timeline would be very inconsistent), which is where Paul called out Peter regarding circumcision.
>However Paul states the opposite numerous times. This led to James confronting him about it in acts 21.
Perhaps, however with the Incident at Antioch and the later Epistles Paul's view on circumcision was consistent with Peter's in Acts 15.
>Jesus actually mean's God's salvation. Joshua means God is my salvation.
True, but both are translated the same in Greek. Hence they have to differentiate between Joshua and Jesus, and this carried on to the Vulgate (partially translated from Hebrew), and then to the KJV.

Couldn't agree more. Still more people need to wake up.