>>11001
Worked so far, at least on .net, .org didn't cooperate.
But now .net's down again.

>>11006
.net is up and down alternately.
Anyway. .org has 100MB cap (I guess due to the ddos mitigation service), so overt that things won't work. Is there a problem with large but <100 MB files as well?

>>11007
If there is a problem it's with the description (Max file size: 350.00 MB).

Also BOs can set limits to uploaded files.

it broke again

>>10106
seconded

>>10107
Hell, I like you. You can come over to my house and fuck my sister.

>>10100
OdiliTime is finally beginning the process of fixing the database so we can upgrade lynxchan, update our frontend and fix our fucking shit. The first step is exporting the database contents so we can put them back in an unfucked database, which is contesting access to the existing DB with lynxchan. That's where the 500s are coming from. Once the DB is unfucked and we're on a recent version of lynxchan 500s should be a thing of the past. Hang in there, baby.

>>10109
>OdiliTime is finally beginning the process of fixing the database
oh well I was getting tired of all these stupid images tbh

>>10110
yeah no, that was a one time fuckup and what we're doing now isn't going to make that fuckup happen again

>>19141
А-га. Вот и ты. То есть, это значит что это ты эта крыса. Создай свой отдельный тред с изуродованными мёртвами солдатами и тащи их туда. Но ты же подонок и крыса. А подлые крысы только и могут что срут везде, лишь только напакостить.

>>19142
Нет, это ты катись к хуям, одебилевший выродок. Желаю тебе сдохнуть точно так же, как сдохли те на кого ты дрочишь. Тому, кто дрочит на мертвых солдат, желаю сдохнуть так же как эти солдаты. Но только не раньше, чем он вынудит тебя уйти с борды. А пока что он делает благое дело, спамит в тред спамеру. Думаешь можешь безнаказанно срать? Хуй тебе. Клин клином вышибают.

Кудой писать на разбан в ОБР?
Спасибо

>>19147
When you try to post it should give an alert window which says you are banned.
There should be an input field which the label Appeal.
Write a short text of your reasons.
Send it.
Board Owner or Volunteer might lift your ban if he accepts your appeal.

If the alert says something like "known spammer", then see this thread: >>11813

>>19148
Thank you very much!
Have a good evening.

>>9986
>we must fight the globalist Russian censorship
>threaten them to lawyer up and contact the MSM
top larp

Mutahar somewhat acknowledged this tweet in his latest video for anyone interested
https://www.youtube.com/embed/RcbOUFdfWK0?start=2197

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [eais#626255] Роскомнадзор информирует/the Roscomnadzor is informing
Date: 2018-10-03 20:10
From: Роскомнадзор <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>

Направляется уведомление о внесении в «Единый реестр доменных имен, указателей страниц сайтов в сети «Интернет» и сетевых адресов, позволяющих идентифицировать сайты в сети «Интернет», содержащие информацию, распространение которой в Российской Федерации запрещено» следующего(их) указателя (указателей) страницы (страниц) сайта в сети «Интернет»: https://endchan.xyz/librejp/preview/126790.html .

В случае непринятия провайдером хостинга и (или) владельцем сайта мер по удалению запрещенной информации и (или) ограничению доступа к сайту в сети «Интернет», будет принято решение о включении в единый реестр сетевого адреса, позволяющего идентифицировать сайт в сети «Интернет», содержащий информацию, распространение которой в Российской Федерации запрещено, а доступ к нему будет ограничен.

Сведения о включении доменных имен, указателей страниц сайтов сети «Интернет» и сетевых адресов доступны круглосуточно в сети «Интернет» по адресу http://eais.rkn.gov.ru .

С уважением,
ФЕДЕРАЛЬНАЯ СЛУЖБА ПО НАДЗОРУ В СФЕРЕ СВЯЗИ, ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫХ ТЕХНОЛОГИЙ И МАССОВЫХ КОММУНИКАЦИЙ.

>>10063
Noice.

>>10063
Just tell them that the servers aren't hosted in russia and therefore are not subject to their laws and be done with it.

If they don't like it they can throw another shit-fit and invade another european country for all we care.

Generally: give us 72 hours to reply.

>>19390
There is a "don't index on top boards and board list" checkbox on the board management page.

So. As him >>19395 said BOs can exclude the board from the boards list and the top boards index.
This does not exclude the board however from the overboard, the latest posts, and the new images feed.
Imageboards did not mean to be private chatrooms. Surely other solutions, platforms exist that suitable for that purpose. We're gladly host your content (as you said it is not illegal) but there are limitations, both of the engine and the format (the "genre" if you will).

>>19396
Role signature for validation.

>>19396
I think that option does exclude the board from the latest posts feed. But not from the overboard or recent images.

>>20036
>Those links are broken on mod-view of a thread.
The post ability also are broken on mod-view of a thread?
>>20036
>My understanding is that it removes the image from the database
Is it useful for any reasons?

>>20037
>Is it useful for any reasons?
I think it's need for moderation. If you delete spam without this check box, anyone still can see image with direct link, so it can be abused.

Retarded niggers, KEK

>>11577
What does 'wide range ban' & 'narrow range ban' mean?

bamp

>>10487
no new but may have been broken. Not sure I did anything specific to fix it.

>>10488
Ah. Might have been my end
>>10486
>>10485
>>10484
I've isolated this. If you type the captcha in only in the reply form at the top of the thread and then hit enter while still clicked in that box it will take you to a new page saying either 'post successful, click here to return to thread' or throw a captcha error. Every other method of posting (clicking new reply button in top form, clicking new reply button in quick reply form, hitting enter in new reply form's captcha box) will just post and stay on the thread's page. Minor issue but a strange one.

How the work's going?

so is this the big thing that happens on the 20th?

Is it happening or what?

also, another annoying thing there are a ton of dynamic mobile (cellular network) IPs that are banned forever because some other person has used them for spam in the past, basically often making it impossible for me to post with mobile data because i get some random ip that's banned

>>18400
This is it, many, but more like A LOT! of TOR exit nodes are banned and you need to change IP to be able to post.

The other day I had to swtich TOR IP because it rejected saying you're banned for real spam and that's not because of BO banned the Ip because it was in my OWN B! so that was an IP banned GLOBALLY!

Besides individual Board Owners there appears to be some kind of GLOBAL ban of some TOR exit nodes for reasons besides the obvious CP many logs say spam but that can be kind of subjective what is exactly spam and according to whom, kind of like twitter hate speech

So we're asking to remove global bans of TOR, dynamic mobile, VPN and even home IPs for reasons that are not CP

To be able to post this I had to switch IP again, because seems like some three letter agency used that IP to inject CP SPAM banned till 2 abril 2023 to Endchan to suppress free speech.

So mossad if you read this you can go drink poison no one will miss your big yid nose

>>18398
>>18403
Question: do you use Tor on our onion site, or you load a clearnet address of ours with your Tor browser?
I did some testing, starting from here: >>>/test/5630
The first 8 posts are done with the Tor browser on our primary onion address.
Then I opened another tab, and loaded a clearnet address and posted there, resulting that South Korean post.
Then I posted again, now noting the nationality of the exit node.
From there I posted alternately on the onion site and on the clearnet frontend. With the clearnet, occasionally it was identified as if it wasn't a Tor post. On one occasion I got the ban message as well, I made the screenshot that it shows the clearnet address, and the availability of the onion site. No such thing happened when I stayed on our tor address.
So I suggest using Tor on either of our onion address. You can find those on our home page.

>>18405
idk i use tor to access zlibrary

>>18405
Yep, on clearnet site endchan.net
Or a bug of sorts or like we have been saying many TOR IPs are banned for the exact same reason which looks strange because I have not seen a single instance of CP but of course I don't watch all posts on all boards and when the logs or ban message refer to CP hopes it really means it, it would be a waste of resources (IPs) to ban an IP just because someone memed with a pic that happened include a kid/kids but nothing to do with pr0n or child abuse
Ok will try to use the onion address when get that message but also for the community health and sake to fix that bug and/or ban mishandling so people stay here one of the bastions of really free speech on the net like 8kun or gab no that joke of free speech maximalist of Elon Musk

>>19113
We figured out spoilering is reserved for board staff, so that's not an error.
I don't think it's browser dependent.
What is the situation with spoilers now?
Do you have JS turned off?

>>19117
>What is the situation with spoilers now?
Nothing has changed for the better yet, OP images still can't be spoilered
>Do you have JS turned off?
I've tried to spoiler OP images both with and without JS, same result: I get a message that the image has been spoilered, but it's a false message as it remains unspoilered
I've also given a try with a different browser but it was a failure there too

If it's neither the browser, and neither the presence or absence of JS, what else could it be the reason? What other board specific settings are there which relate to spoilers?
Something has changed between 02/10/2024 and 02/06/2024 leading to this bug,
could it be a third party dependency inside the spoilering function which got updated by the third party library and which introduced some kind of incompatibility?
(i'm totally trying to guess, as i've no clue how the spoiler funcion is coded)

>>19118
Are you spoiling from "Moderate Thread" or somewhere else?

>>19119
The sequence of actions I do to spoiler an image are:
1) open the thread
2) click on "Moderate Thread", to enable the moderation actions
3) select the checkbox of the post to spoiler, in this case the OP post
4) click on the "Spoil files" button, from the actions panel at the page bottom (this action doesn't seem to require the captcha)
Then I get the "Files spoilered" confirmation message, then nothing happens
This same operation did work previously, these OP images were spoilered manually >>>/dump/432 >>>/dump/818 now it no longer works

Out of curiosity, there exist other places from where it's possible to spoiler, aside the "Moderate Thread" viewmode?

>>19123
I'll look into making this easier on Magrathea