For testing purposes block bypass is turned off for 24 hours.

We are doing this experiment to strengthen our ban system.
It is very likely that Tor posting will be not available during this period.
Anyone who fell into range ban accidentally, please report in on IRC, Discord or Twitter.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.

The IRC network called Darkscience is completely Tor-friendly (and has been for 9 years now).
https://www.darkscience.net/
It's even mentioned on Tor's IRC compatibility page:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/BlockingIrc
Wouldn't having the endchan channels better there?
The only con is that it's less than a third of the size of Rizon with fewer servers.

What's the current file size limit on endchan? It doesn't seem to be 350 MB since I can't seem to upload a 111 MB webm. I keep getting 413 Request Entity Too Large.

Hello frens,

I know the spotty up-time over February was a bit shit, so I've come to share some details. We've had to change the way the .net site operates and service seems to be solid now. The infrastructure endchan uses didn't change, but some of the underlying hardware did.

From the client perspective, you would have received a TCP reset packet which manifested in your browser as a "connection refused". On the server side, this was caused by intermittent failures with iptables. Semi-randomly traffic wouldn't get redirected and the system responded with a refusal as result. This behavior (or lack of) could be temporarily resolved be restarting the networking stack entirely.

We've reworked the pipeline to remove the dependency on iptables all-together. It's not a true resolution, we believe the root of the issue may be within the implementation of the network stack provided by the virtualization platform.

Sorry about the interruptions, things should be stable now but if you're experiencing issues please let us know.

Anons!

We want to ask your input on a matter and with it keep you involved navigating the site since it's a community effort.
As probably you know it, another shooting happened, this time in Halle, Germany, and maybe in the future others will happen. Our question is: should we (as a community, the staff, BOs, volunteers and users) let users repost acquired footage of the acts, or share links to it?
To make it more clear: we didn't, don't and won't assist for committing crimes and helping the attackers, their - or presumably their - posts still won't be tolerated. We are talking about discussing the events and the free flow of information.
If it's possible post your reasoning what should be done.

Thank you!

There's a guy on https://endchan.net/bubblegum/ who keeps making spambot posts like this everyday. Reporting the posts doesn't seem to do much.

Can any moderators help with removing this guy?

>there isnt a personal css settings tab to test your own custom css for your board
Can this be added?

Can torposters be banned separately?

The owner of endchan.net has configured their website improperly. To protect your information from being stolen, Tor Browser has not connected to this website.

endchan.net uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate expired on March 21, 2019, 9:07 PM. The current time is March 21, 2019, 9:16 PM.

I've been considering changing the way endchan handles boards. I think it's obvious at this point that completely free board creation and completely soverign BOs doesn't really work; judging from 8chan you just get a massive graveyard of unused boards with none of the independence people were raving about back in 2014. Basically you get redchanit. On the other hand I think it's self-evident that letting users moderate themselves and have input on board creation is a good idea. I want to see what you guys think about it, but here's what I'm thinking of as a broad-strokes plan right now:

>1. Nuke all the zero-post boards so the site looks like less of a ghost town
>2. Start compiling a list of boards to keep
>3. Turn off board creation for normal accounts, set up a process for topic splitting (where there's enough traffic for a topic to justify its own board; think /tg/ splitting off of /b/ in the ancient days of 4chan) and refugees from other sites to get their own boards
>4. Add a "don't be a shit BO or you're getting ejected" clause to the global rules
>5. Delete the small and dead boards that didn't make the list from 2, giving plenty of warning so people can archive their favorite threads

I think that this way we'll get some of the promised benefits that the "redchanit" model was supposed to give imageboards (BOs that actually give a shit, a board list that reflects posting activity) and not the bullshit.

NONE OF THIS IS GUARANTEED TO HAPPEN. THIS IS JUST A TEST BALLOON AT THIS STAGE.

So, what do you guys think? picture unrelated