Not sure.
Perhaps use the "Thread limit" option. The number sets the maximum number of threads. Before you want to add one more thread, raise the number by one. Be aware that if you set it to a lower number than the current amount of threads on board, this will delete the surplus, so don't make the mistake of losing threads.
One thing: don't mistake it with the "Hourly thread limit" option.
In addition to the thread limit, to avoid bumping off threads, you might wanna pin all what you have.
So combining these two tools in theory you could achieve what you want.

>>19172
You could use moderate thread and lock all the threads

>>19154
there aren't any posts sexualizing her and there aren't even any posts identifying her at all so i don't know how you're claiming it's causing harrassment. obviously you're lying about both of those things so you're probably lying about her being 15 too.

>>19154
Those photos clearly aren't sexual exploitation.
Also the claim that she's 15 year old cannot be validated. Trying to validate that (by posting name, date of birth, photos of documents...) would be a very bad decision.
There is nothing there that could be considered as harassment. There is no harassment on site.
If she's getting harassed on other social media or chat service, such as Facebook, Instagram, Discord, then please complain to the maintainers of those services, because they should take that seriously.

>>19159
>>19160
nigga thinks reposting photos of a girls face is illegal

>>19141
А-га. Вот и ты. То есть, это значит что это ты эта крыса. Создай свой отдельный тред с изуродованными мёртвами солдатами и тащи их туда. Но ты же подонок и крыса. А подлые крысы только и могут что срут везде, лишь только напакостить.

>>19142
Нет, это ты катись к хуям, одебилевший выродок. Желаю тебе сдохнуть точно так же, как сдохли те на кого ты дрочишь. Тому, кто дрочит на мертвых солдат, желаю сдохнуть так же как эти солдаты. Но только не раньше, чем он вынудит тебя уйти с борды. А пока что он делает благое дело, спамит в тред спамеру. Думаешь можешь безнаказанно срать? Хуй тебе. Клин клином вышибают.

Кудой писать на разбан в ОБР?
Спасибо

>>19147
When you try to post it should give an alert window which says you are banned.
There should be an input field which the label Appeal.
Write a short text of your reasons.
Send it.
Board Owner or Volunteer might lift your ban if he accepts your appeal.

If the alert says something like "known spammer", then see this thread: >>11813

>>19148
Thank you very much!
Have a good evening.

>necrophiliac, who repeatedly spams all the Russian boards with his threads with hanged corpses, specifically to get in the way of people who hide such content, is complaining about another necrophiliac posting corpses in his threads
You get what you deserve, faggot. I hope you both die in the same horrible way as those people that you wank off to.

>>18915
Thanks

"small cx" links where just removed from /news/, banned 5 years and with the illegal pedo image deletion from the server option. Letting you know to keep an eye out on other boards.

>>19132
I have no idea what you're talking about.

>>19133
He's talking about the cp spam

>>19132
>>19136
Okay, I figured out eventually. One wave of cp spam apparently left on site, for some reason we did not catch it. BOs were at their place however. Thanks for them not much left. Furthermore in the past weeks we noticed the cp smap changed, or still getting changed, and such boards gets targeted that were not before.
Anyway, thanks for letting us know.

Here two examples of id-less posters in a board with ids enabled
>>>/dump/1085
>>>/dump/1086

to be more specific, every post, when looked at in the moderation mode, has an hash of the ip address
the id-less posts lack any hashed ip, they are basically ip-less, so it's impossible to ban them

this isn't the first time i've seen these odd information-lacking posts on boards, they stand out pretty much usually, but i can't find more examples at the moment

is this an expected behaviour for the site? or what could be causing this occurrence?

>>19088
>>19089
Posters using tor and posting through the onion domain will not have ids or IP hashes.

You can disable posting from Tor in the board settings.

As posters noted above those are users posting via Tor or Lokinet. They don't get IDs or IP hashes, they are all count as 1 poster (on the whole site) and they aren't included the number of posters on the board page.
BOs can disallow the use of Tor on their board, that option was included in case of certain attacks. I encourage you not to choose using it, unless it's absolutely necessary.

>>19090
>>19091
>>19092
I see, thanks for the answers

>>19052
>Do a hard refresh, or empty your cache
That helped, thanks.

Tests on .net, 8-40-125MB files:
>>>/test/6295
>>>/test/6296
>>>/test/6297
It works for me(tm)
I dunno what could be the problem with uploads.

>>19053
Splendid.

>>19045
Is anyone having problems with no new replies showing up? It's spooky, I mostly see only the Russian boards being replied to rn

>>19065
Get more users to English language boards.
You see Russian replies because those boards are the largest.

>>19065
Makes sense, out of the top 15 boards by traffic, 6 are Russian

>>19059
I see, thanks for the answers

>>19060
Sure.
Keep in mind that imageboard content were intended to be ephemeral, and while small chans (including Endchan) can keep data for a long time, they aren't safe storage places. Tho perhaps safer than the fashionable normie cloud storage...
We don't really touch even abandoned boards, because we know users expect their stuff to be here when (if) they return.

So looking at this in an empirical way,
the current record for file retention is: 6 years
(from 2024 to 2018)

And that time is currently limited to 6 years only because of site bugs/errors and not because of any site policy

>>19062
Yes.

>>19061
yep, it's a stretch to rely on imageboards for archiving, pure archives have better file duration, bigger archiving space, and better organizing tools, but also less public visibility, and often also stricter content policies actively removing content
it's a trade off, as for many things

>We don't really touch even abandoned boards, because we know users expect their stuff to be here when (if) they return.
That's something which is always nice to see, as it's becoming rarer to find online old sites and ancient messages from people even decades ago, internet has become a place focusing only on the now, with no past nor future