Type a password into the password field before posting. Leave it there.
You can delet posts you made with passwords, with the form at the bottom of the page. Mark the checkbox at your post, then go to the form, type your password into the password field, then click delete.
Note: BOs have options to turn off user deletions.

>>18342
But what if you didn't add a password to the original post?

Then you don't.

>>18324
Does it always do this? Or did it eventually go through? My best guess is a backend restart or a captcha expired.

>>18325
Not always, but I kept refreshing the captcha and it kept saying it was wrong. I'll have to wait for someone who needs a ban to find out again.

>>18324
You should always refresh it before typing it.

>>18327
My mistake. I meant the 'reload' button I kept hitting and typing in a new captcha with the same wrong result, not browser refresh. Maybe I should tried the whole browser refresh. It wasn't working then but it is now.

>>18328
*should have tried

>>10980
>I think torposting can be disabled on per board basis
Correct

t. testing if its disabled here

>>10984
>i think it's possible on newest engine versions
How? My cookies are gone when i close the browser. I have to bare my shield and allow js to fill out a single bypass then i can assume full security. Other chans with Tor posting are the same. Not sure how it is with bans as i have only received bans on 4chan for "trolling" when being serious or because my dynamic ip changed to one that got banned 6 years prior. Seems real easy to ban evade and a fight to keep them banned as >>10981 suggests

>>10981
best bet is to probably set up word filters or md5 filters in the admin menu of the board plus the mods.

How to know whether a board bans Tor without trying to post?

>>18307
Ask the BO...
Actually there is a board message option in the board moderation tools, if asked BOs could add if they disabled Tor.
But due to your question now we are thinking how could we add an indicator, maybe just above the posting form.

>>12134
It works now.

>>12136
Ah I see. Thanks again.

Put an end to all the dick pic spam on multiple boards
BAN the VPN that Ori or whomever is using
contact that VPN to have them ban the spammer for TOS

Still looking for help.

Implemented the unspoiler-spoiler script, so no userscript manager is needed.
This is how it works:
- mark the checkbox the unspoiler the spoilered stuff on the page
- untick it to spoiler again

>>12099
Thank you for your work!

>>18275
Hello.
Can you add time offset for post timestamps?
Like make posts 5-60 minutes before?

Some ISP's forced by governments to collect connections metadata for surveillance, even how much bytes were sent at some time.
And some companies collect social media posts to get anons ass, manipulate people, predict trends.
Post photos some times and you can be tracked by unique size and date, even in tor.
They want more control like in china.
They want to shut up freedom of speech.
Fuck them all.

Restoring threads are not possible. Deleted content are permanently deleted. No archives are kept. This is an imageboard and not a regular forum.
Which board was your thread on?

>>18251
.org is behind CloudFlare and we had to redirect because it helps out with the flood. It is temporary, we are still battling with the spam, and will find a solution.
I suggest using Lokinet, our address is on our home page. It is similar to Tor, but a bit faster. But can be fiddly depending on your tech knowledge.
It can be done via Tor too, and that needs only the Tor browser, but it will probably slower.

>>18252
It seems such difficulty for Board Owners getting into our accounts would cause more spam to fester. Why isn't the feature available on .org?

>>18262
CloudFlare caches agressively and sometimes happens that after login someone else's account is displayed. It is unusable, so can't change things, but can expose email address, if one added it.

Now it's possible to log in on .org. But please be aware the possibility of the aforementioned issue.

>>18274
Thanks. I don't believe I have added any email addresses. That does sound like a problem issue. As long as it's unusable though.

>>18267
>our position is that the content is harmful due to the context or location in which it is being made publicly available.
Interesting opinion, given Endchan administration's demonstrated hostility to CP. While there has been some cat and mouse games from CP raiders and suchlike, it all clearly shows Endchan stance. As said, the context of the thread and board show it was not a CP advocacy discussion.
That one post does feel like a drive-by cat and mouse troll though.
I think I'll fall back on my earlier reasoning regarding violent content posting on Endchan. I appreciate Odilitime stance and approach to free speech content. However, Endchan has a lot of other users and content that should be protected over and above one meaningless drive-by post.
>>18277
On the other hand, if he chooses to leave things be, it's probably best not to publicly commit to a course of action until someone pulls that trigger. Meanwhile, he could just point to the site's rules and history of active CP suppression, invite further user discussion, and wait.

>>18277
>>18278
If you don't mind I don't separate my replies.
If our users wish the image deleted we aren't against it. On a quicker chan, on a more active board it was probably already gone.
It is still up, because the aforementioned facts still stand: the photo doesn't depict anything illegal, and the context of the thread and the posts around don't make it suggestive or "obscene". The intent of the poster might have been trolling, but trolling isn't illegal either. We don't promote csam with keeping it up, and if anything with this discussion started we might be able to raise awareness of existing problems.
Great example would be the cp spam Endchan is regularly attacked with - which we never hesitate to remove - , and from what I saw, read it seems other imageboards are effected by it too. I highly doubt any of our users interested in clicking those links, someone still run that spam again and again, for years now.
For now the image remains, the input from users are welcomed, basically any comment about the topic, if it should be taken down and why, or about the contents of the mail (>>18268 yeah, wtf; also >>18269 "cp star" wtf), or this organization which sent the mail, etc.
>US Government sends
Cybertip.ca doesn't seem like an institution of the Canadian government, what I can gather from the about pages, it looks like it is run by a private organization (although it is acknowledged and supported by Canadian govt. - so they claim, to what extent, it is not clear from a superficial read).
From us the US Govt. can sleep peacefully, we got their backs covered and do our job. I believe if we aren't quick enough, or a post with actual csam falls through the cracks, and don't get deleted in a significant amount of time, our users will make reports.

>>18279
Forgot role signature for validation.

That's Masha. Do not image search her. You have to be familiar with CP to know she's involved in CP. Any idea from our Russian bros for what the sign says?

>>18279
>basically any comment about the topic, if it should be taken down and why
My additional concerns are the further identification of what could be the victims name, potential location of the victim, and how to potentially find more content using a resource hosted by this site (>>18281). It is disgusting.

How about hiding them with custom css?

>>18265
Is this possible? If so what do I put in my custom .css to do so?

>>18271
I will take a look.

>>18271
You can select these particular elements you want to hide with the :nth-child(x) selector, where the x is the number of the element.
The elements of the form is in the table and the "Password" and "Drawing" fields are in the 5th and 6th table rows, or in the 4th and 5th if you force anonymity via your board's settings (ie. no "Name" field).
Then you can use display: none; css rule to hide elements (there are other options, if you prefer something else you can use that ofc);
Since no other table rows on the page you could use the following:

tr:nth-child(4), tr:nth-child(5) {
  display: none;
}

Or:

tr:nth-child(5), tr:nth-child(6) {
  display: none;
}

Depending on the Name field, as I wrote above. This is important, you don't want to hide captcha accidentally or something.

Can you remove names of uploaded files?

>>12112
They can just make a hash of the pics and compare if they want to identify you. Renaming won't do any good.

>>12113
Compare hash with what?

>>12112
This should be an option for the poster or the board, not enforced site wide if implemented.

The culture I'm used to has a habit of leaving messages commenting on the image in the filename. Removing it for everyone would remove a feature.

This still could be important.